Method for growing thin films by catalytic enhancement Number:6,811,814 from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) owispatent A method of growing a thin film onto a substrate. A precursor of the film is fed into a reaction space in the form of a vapor phase pulse causing the precursor to adsorb onto the surface of the substrate to form a layer thereof. A catalyst is susequently fed into the reaction space in an amount to substantially convert the layer of the precursor to the desired thin film. The above steps may be repeated to achieve the desired film thickness.<H enhancement, catalytic, Method, for, grow, 6811814.html, Patent, pto, 6811814

Title: Method for growing thin films by catalytic enhancement

Abstract: A method of growing a thin film onto a substrate. A precursor of the film is fed into a reaction space in the form of a vapor phase pulse causing the precursor to adsorb onto the surface of the substrate to form a layer thereof. A catalyst is susequently fed into the reaction space in an amount to substantially convert the layer of the precursor to the desired thin film. The above steps may be repeated to achieve the desired film thickness.

Patent Number: 6,811,814 Issued on 11/02/2004 to Chen, et al.

Inventors: Chen; Ling (Sunnyvale, CA); Cao; Wei (Milpitas, CA)
Assignee: Applied Materials, Inc. (Santa Clara, CA)

Appl. No.: 10/052,049

Filed: January 16, 2002

Current U.S. Class: 427/248.1 ; 427/252; 427/255.28; 427/255.7

Field of Search: 427/248.1,252,255.28,255.7 117/88,104

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents


4058430	November 1977	Suntola et al.
4389973	June 1983	Suntola et al.
4413022	November 1983	Suntola et al.
4767494	August 1988	Kobayashi et al.
4806321	February 1989	Nishizawa et al.
4840921	June 1989	Matsumoto
4845049	July 1989	Sunakawa
4859627	August 1989	Sunakawa
4861417	August 1989	Mochizuki et al.
4876218	October 1989	Pessa et al.
4993357	February 1991	Scholz
5082798	January 1992	Arimoto
5130269	July 1992	Kitahara et al.
5166092	November 1992	Mochizuki et al.
5225366	July 1993	Yoder
5250148	October 1993	Nishizawa et al.
5256244	October 1993	Ackerman
5270247	December 1993	Sakuma et al.
5278435	January 1994	Van Hove et al.
5281274	January 1994	Yoder
5290748	March 1994	Knuuttila et al.
5294286	March 1994	Nishizawa et al.
5300186	April 1994	Kitahara et al.
5316793	May 1994	Wallace et al.
5330610	July 1994	Eres et al.
5336324	August 1994	Stall et al.
5338389	August 1994	Nishizawa et al.
5374570	December 1994	Nasu et al.
5395791	March 1995	Cheng et al.
5438952	August 1995	Otsuka
5443033	August 1995	Nishizawa et al.
5458084	October 1995	Thorne et al.
5480818	January 1996	Matsumoto et al.
5483919	January 1996	Yokoyama et al.
5484664	January 1996	Kitahara et al.
5532511	July 1996	Nishizawa et al.
5637530	June 1997	Gaines et al.
5705224	January 1998	Murota et al.
5711811	January 1998	Suntola et al.
5730802	March 1998	Ishizumi et al.
5744192	April 1998	Nguyen et al.
5851849	December 1998	Comizzoli et al.
5855680	January 1999	Soininen et al.
5879459	March 1999	Gadgil et al.
5916365	June 1999	Sherman
5963139	October 1999	Littke
6015590	January 2000	Suntola et al.
6025627	February 2000	Forbes et al.
6036773	March 2000	Wang et al.
6042652	March 2000	Hyun et al.
6043177	March 2000	Falconer et al.
6090442	July 2000	Klaus et al.
6110530	August 2000	Chen et al.
6113977	September 2000	Soininen et al.
6124158	September 2000	Dautartas et al.
6130147	October 2000	Major et al.
6139700	October 2000	Kang et al.
6143659	November 2000	Leem
6174377	January 2001	Doering et al.
6174809	January 2001	Kang et al.
6197683	March 2001	Kang et al.
6200893	March 2001	Sneh
6203613	March 2001	Gates et al.
6207302	March 2001	Sugiura et al.
6248605	June 2001	Harkonen et al.
6270572	August 2001	Kim et al.
6287965	September 2001	Kang et al.
6291876	September 2001	Stumborg et al.
6305314	October 2001	Sneh et al.
6306216	October 2001	Kim et al.
6316098	November 2001	Yitzchaik et al.
6464779	October 2002	Powell et al.
6503330	January 2003	Sneh et al.
2002/0018849	February 2002	George et al.

Foreign Patent Documents


0442490	Aug., 1991	EP
499294	Aug., 1992	EP
0799641	Oct., 1997	EP
2355727	May., 2001	GB
62091495	Apr., 1987	JP
4031396	Feb., 1992	JP
11269652	Oct., 1999	JP
2001062244	Mar., 2001	JP
199901595	Jan., 1991	WO
199110510	Jul., 1991	WO
199929924	Jun., 1999	WO
200015865	Mar., 2000	WO
200015881	Mar., 2000	WO
200016377	Mar., 2000	WO
200055895	Apr., 2000	WO
200063957	Oct., 2000	WO
200079019	Dec., 2000	WO
200079576	Dec., 2000	WO
200115220	Mar., 2001	WO
200127346	Apr., 2001	WO
200127347	Apr., 2001	WO
200129280	Apr., 2001	WO
200136702	May., 2001	WO
200140541	Jun., 2001	WO

Other References

JW. Elam, C.E. Nelson, R.K. Grubs, S.M. George Nucleation and growth during tungsten atomic layer deposition of SiO.sub.2 surfaces, Thin Solid Films 386 41-52 (2001). .
J.W. Klaus, S.J. Ferro, S.M. George Atomic layer deposition of tungsten using sequential surface chemisty with a sacrifical stripping reaction, Thin Solid Films 360 145-153 (2000). .
S.P. Denbaars, A. Hariz, C. Beyler, B.Y. Maa, Q. Chen, and P.D. Dapkus The Growth of AlGaAs/GaAs heterostructures by atomic layer epitaxy, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. vol. 102, 527-532, 1988. .
T. Suntola and M. Simpson Atomic Layer Epitaxy, Blackie and Son, 1990. .
T.I. Hukka, R.E. Rawles, M.P. D'Evelyn Novel method for chemical vapor deposition and atomic layer epitaxy using radical chemistry, Thin Solid Films 225 (Mar. 25, 1993) 212-218. .
N. Kobayashi, T. Makimoto, Y. Yamauchi, and Y. Horikoshi Investigation of growth processes in flow-rate modulation epitaxy and atomic layer epitaxy by new in-situ optical monitoring method, Acta Polytechnica Scandinavica, Chemical Technology and Metallurgy Series, No. 195 (Jun. 1, 1990), pp. 139-144. .
D.T.J. Hurle Handbook of Crystal Growth 3: Thin Films and Epitaxy Part B: Growth Mechanisms and Dynamics, Chapter 14 (Atomic Layer Epitaxy), Elsevier Science B.V., 1994. .
C.H. Liu, M. Yokoyama, and Y.K. Su Effect of Atomic Layer Epitaxy Growth Conditions on the Properties of ZnS Epilayers on (100)-Si Substrate, Jpn.J.Appl.Phys. vol. 35 pp. 5416-5420, (1996). .
J.W. Klaus, A.W. Ott, J.M. Johnson, and S.M. George Atomic Layer controlled growth of SiO.sub.2 films using binary reaction sequence chemistry, Appl. Phys. Lett. 70 (9), Mar. 3, 1997. .
S. Yamaga and A. Yoshikawa Atomic layer epitaxy of ZnS by a new gas supplying system in low-pressure metalorganic vapor phase epitaxy, Journal of Crystal Growth 117 152-155 (1996). .
S. Nishikawa, H. Kakinuma, T. Watanabe, and K. Nihei Preparation of a-Si:H/a-Si.sub.1-x Cx:H Superlattices, Jpn.J.Appl.Phys. vol. 25, No. 8 pp. 1141-1143 )Aug. 1, 1986). .
A. Watanabe, T. Isu, M. Hata, T. Kamijoh, and Yoshifumi The mechanism of self-limiting growth of atomic layer epitaxy of GaAs by metalorganic molecular beam epitaxy using trimethylgallium and arsine, Jpn.J.Appl.Phys. vol. 28 No. 7 pp. L 1080 -L 1082 (Jul. 1, 1989). .
J. Nishizawa, H. Abe and T. Kurabayashi Molecular layer epitaxy, J. Electrochem. Soc.: Solid State Science and Technology vol. 132, No. 5 1197-1200 (May 1, 1985). .
K. Kodama, M. Ozeki, K. Mochizuki, and N. Ohtsuka In situ x-ray photoelectron spectroscopic study of GaAs grown by atomic layer epitaxy, Appl. Phys. Lett. 54(7) 656-657 (Feb. 13, 1989). .
J. Creighton, K. Lykke, V. Shamamian, and B. Kay Decomposition of trimethylgallium on the gallium-rich GaAs (100) surface: implications for atomic layer epitaxy, Appl. Phys. Lett. 57 (3) 279-281 (Jul. 16, 1990). .
J.T. Yates, C.C. Cheng, Q. Gao, M.L. Colaianni, and W.J. Choyke Atomic H: a reagent for the extraction of chemical speies from Si surfaces, Thin Solid Films 225 150-154 (1993). .
T. Suntola Cost-effective processing by atomic layer epitaxy, Thin Solid Films 225 96-98 (1993). .
S. Imai, T. Iizuka, O. Sugiura, and M. Matsumura Atomic layer epitaxy of Si using atomic H, Thin Solid Films 225 168-172 (1993). .
H. Nagasawa and Y. Yamaguch Atomic level epitaxy of 3C-SiC by low pressure vapour deposition with alternating gas supplyi, Thin Solid Films 225 230-234, 1994. .
T. Suntola Development challenges of atomic layer epitaxy, Acta Polytechnica Scandinavica, Chemical Technology and Metallurgy Series, No. 195 (1990), pp. 93-106, Jun. 1, 1990. .
J. Wisser, P. Czuprin, W. Richter, and P. Balk Pulsed flow epitaxy of InP in a standard LP-MOVPE reactor, Acta Polytechnica Scandinavica, Chemical Technology and Metallurgy Series, No. 195 (Jun. 1,1990), pp. 123-129. .
H. Yokoyama, M. Shinohara, and N. Inoue Atomic layer epitaxy of GaAs using nitrogen carrie gas, Appl. Phys. Lett. 59(17) 2148-2149, Oct. 21, 1991. .
M. de Keijser and C. van Opdorp Atomic layer epitaxy of gallium arsenide with the use of atomic hydrogen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 58(11), 1187-1189, Mar. 18, 1991. .
E. Colas, R. Bhat and B.J. Skromme; G.C. NihousAtomic layer of epitaxy of device quality GaAs, Appl. Phys. Lett. 55(26), 2769-2771, Dec. 25, 1989. .
P.C. Colter, S.A. Hussien, A. Dip, M.U. Erdogan, W.M. Duncan and S.M. Bedair Atomic layer epitaxy of device GaAs with a 0.6 um/h growth rate, Appl. Phys. Lett. 59(12), 1440-1442, Sep. 16, 1991. .
S.M. Bedair, M.A. Tischler, T. Katsuyama, and N.A. El-Masry Atomic layer epitaxy of III-V binary compounds, Appl. Phys. Lett, 47(1), Jul. 1, 1985. .
M. Ozeki, K. Mochizuki, N. Ohtstuka, and K. Kodama Kinetic processes in atomic-layer epitaxy of GaAs and AIAs using a pulsed vapor-phase method, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, vol. 5, No. 4, Jul. 1, 1987/Aug. 1987. .
Colin H.L. Goodman Atomic Layer epitaxy, J. Appl. Phys. 60 (3), Aug. 1, 1986. .
S.M. Rossnagel, A. Sherman and F. Turner Plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition of Ta and Ti for interconnect diffusion barriers. .
R. Ares, C.A. Tran an S.P. Watkins Determination of growth parameters for atomic layer epitaxy using reflectance difference spectroscopy, Can. J. Phys. (Suppl.) 74:S85-S88 (1996). .
I. Bhat, S. Akram Atomic layer epitaxial growth studies of ZnSe using dimethylzinc and hydrogen selenide, Journal of Crystal Growth 138 127-130 (1994). .
S.P. Watkins, T. Pinnington, J. Hu, P. Yeo, M. Kluth, N.J. Mason, R.J. Nicholas, P.J. Walker Infrared single wavelength gas composition monitoring for metalorganic vapour-phase epitaxy, Journal of Crystal Growth 221 166-171 (2000). .
D. Rajavel, A. Conte, C.J. Summers Pyrolsis characteristics of iodine precursors for gas source n-type doping of II-VI compounds, Journal of Crystal Growth 140 327-335 (1994). .
M. Leskela, M. Ritala ALD precursor chemistry: Evolution and future challenges, J. Phys. IV France 9 Pr8-837-Pr8-852 (Jun. 21, 1999). .
C.H. Liu, M. Yokohama, Y.K. Su, and N. C. Lee Atomic Layer Epitaxy of ZnS by low-pressure horizontal metalorganic chemical vapor deposition, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 35 pp. 2749-2753, Part 1, No. 5A, (May 1, 1996). .
A. Watanabe, T. Isu, M. Hata, T. Kamijoh, and Y. Katayama The Mechanism of self-limiting growth of atomic layer epitaxy of GaAs by metalorganic molecular beam epitaxy using trimethylgallium and arsine, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 28, No. 7, Jul. 1989, pp. L. 1080-L 1082, Jul. 1, 1989. .
M. Ozeki, K. Mochizuki, N. Ohtsuka, and K. Kodama Kinetic processes in atomic-layer epitaxy of GaAs and AIAs using a pulsed vapor-phase method, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 5(4), Jul./Aug. 1987..

Primary Examiner: Meeks; Timothy
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Moser, Patterson & Sheridan LLP

Parent Case Text

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims benefit of provisional application No. 60/261,946, filed Jan. 16, 2001.

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. A method for depositing a metal-containing film to a substrate within a process chamber by an atomic layer deposition technique, comprising: introducing a precursor to the process chamber; adsorbing the precursor to the substrate; purging the process chamber with a purge gas; introducing a process gas comprising the precursor and a reactant; reacting the adsorbed precursor with the process gas to deposit the metal-containing film; and purging the process chamber with the purge gas.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the metal-containing film comprises copper.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the precursor comprises a copper precursor.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the copper precursor is copperhexafluoracetylacetonate trimethylvinylsilane.

5. The method of claim 3, wherein the reactant comprises water.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the purge gas is selected from the group consisting of argon, nitrogen, hydrogen and combinations thereof.

7. A method for depositing a metal-containing film to a substrate within a process chamber by an atomic layer deposition technique, comprising: introducing a metal-containing precursor to the process chamber; adsorbing the metal-containing precursor to the substrate; purging the process chamber with a purge gas; introducing a process gas comprising the metal-containing precursor and a gaseous catalyst; chemically reducing the adsorbed metal-containing precursor with the process gas to deposit the metal-containing film; and purging the process chamber with the purge gas.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the metal-containing film comprises copper.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the metal-containing precursor comprises a copper precursor.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the copper precursor is copperhexafluoracetylacetonate trimethylvinylsilane.

11. The method of claim 9, wherein the gaseous catalyst comprises water.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the purge gas is selected from the group consisting of argon, nitrogen, hydrogen and combinations thereof.

13. A method for depositing a copper-containing film to a substrate within a process chamber by an atomic layer deposition technique, comprising: introducing a copper precursor to the process chamber; adsorbing the copper precursor to the substrate; purging the process chamber with a purge gas; introducing a process gas comprising the copper precursor and a reactant; reacting the adsorbed copper precursor with the process gas; and purging the process chamber with the purge gas.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein the copper precursor is copperhexafluoracetylacetonate trimethylvinylsilane.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the reactant comprises water.

16. The method of claim 13, wherein the reactant comprises water.

17. The method of claim 16, wherein the purge gas is selected from the group consisting of argon, nitrogen, hydrogen and combinations thereof.

18. A method of growing a thin film onto a substrate located with a reaction chamber comprising feeding a precursor of the film into the reaction chamber, causing the precursor to adsorb onto the surface of the substrate to form a layer thereof, and feeding a catalyst and the precursor into the reaction chamber in amounts to substantially convert the layer of the precursor to the thin film, wherein the precursor comprises copperhexafluoracetylacetonate trimethylvinylsilane.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein the catalyst comprises water and the film comprises copper.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a method of growing thin films on substrates in a reaction space being subjected to alternately repeated steps of feeding a precursor followed by feeding a catalyst for the precursor to grow the desired thin film.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

There are a variety of methods employed in the art of growing thin films. For example, chemical vapor deposition (CVD) has been used for many years to deposit solid thin films for a variety of commercial products including integrated circuits. The CVD method consists of exposing a substrate in a reaction chamber to one or more gaseous species that react to form a solid thin film on the substrate surface. CVD may be carried out at atmospheric or sub-atmospheric pressures, and usually requires that the reactivity of the gases be enhanced by heating the substrate or by creating a glow discharge in the reaction chamber. One of the disadvantages of the CVD method is that the gases may take part in undesired gas phase reactions. These undesired gas phase reactions may lead to the formation of particulates, and may also deplete the seed gases before they can reach all areas of the substrate. Thus, the undesired gas phase reactions can impact the quality and uniformity of the thin film being deposited.

An example of a specific CVD process is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,110,530 assigned to the assignee of the present application. The '530 patent discloses a CVD process for depositing a solid thin film of copper that employs a single gaseous precursor to form the copper layer. Although that precursor, hexafluoracetylacetonate-Cu-trimethylvinylsilane (hereinafter hfac-Cu-TMVS), is sufficiently reactive to deposit copper at temperatures below 200.degree. C., the copper deposition rate is undesirably slow. It is, however, undesirable to raise the processing temperature to increase the reaction rate because, among other reasons, higher processing temperatures may degrade previously deposited layers on the substrate. It was found that the slow deposition rate at lower temperatures could be increased by adding water to the hfac-Cu-TMVS precursor. It appears that the water may act as a catalyst, facilitating the decomposition of hfac-Cu-TMVS at lower temperatures. Although the addition of water avoids the need to carry out the CVD deposition at higher temperatures, the problem of undesired gas phase reactions remains. Specifically, the addition of water also facilitates the decomposition of hfac-Cu-TMVS in the gas phase, which can lead to problems such as particulate formation. In other words, catalytically converting the copper precursor to elemental copper with water during a single processing step within the reaction chamber, although having certain advantages, suffers from processing limitations to which the present invention is intended to address.

When a CVD reaction requires more than one gaseous reactant, undesired gas phase reactions between them can by avoided by separately and sequentially introducing the gaseous reactants into the reaction chamber. One method that employs the separate and sequential introduction of gaseous reactants is the Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) method, one version of which is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,058,430. In ALD, the substrate is heated to a temperature such that when a first gas is introduced into a reaction chamber, it chemisorbs on the substrate surface, forming a monolayer. An exact monolayer can be formed because the first layer of the gaseous species is relatively strongly bonded to the surface of the substrate by the chemisorption reaction while any excess reactant is relatively weakly bonded to the chemisorbed monolayer. The excess first gaseous reactant can then be removed from the reaction chamber. This removal may take place by, for example, evacuating the reaction chamber with a vacuum pump or by purging the reaction chamber with an inert gas. Ideally, the monolayer of the first gaseous species remains on the heated substrate surface after the removal of the excess reactant. Next, a second gaseous reactant is introduced into the reaction chamber. The second gaseous reactant reacts with the monolayer to produce the desired solid thin film. The excess of the second reactant, along with any reaction by-products, are then removed from the reaction chamber. Again, the removal may take place by means of evacuating the reaction chamber or purging the reaction chamber with an inert gas. A distinguishing characteristic of the ALD process is that it deposits a precise layer thickness each time the above sequence of steps is repeated. A precise layer thickness is obtained because of the formation of an exact monolayer of the first precursor. The above sequence of steps can be repeated until a thin film of desired thickness is created.

Although ALD may eliminate undesired gas phase reactions between multiple CVD precursors, ALD has a number of disadvantages that limit its utility. One of those disadvantages is that the ALD process can only be used with gaseous species that react with the substrate and with each other within a "temperature window". The temperature window is defined by the constraints that the substrate temperature must be high enough for the second gaseous reactant to react with the chemisorbed monolayer of the first gaseous reactant, but the substrate temperature cannot be so high that the monolayer of the first reactant desorbs. This temperature window severely limits the number of species that are compatible with the ALD process. Furthermore, the temperature window limitation of ALD means that ALD cannot be used to deposit a film from a single gaseous species. The use of a single species is incompatible with ALD because the substrate temperature would have to be high enough for the species to react to form a solid film. Since the film formation reaction would consume any of the species introduced into the reactor, the precise thickness control characteristic of ALD would not be possible. In other words, the deposition process would degrade into CVD with a single reactant. Thus the precise layer control obtainable in ALD, which is made possible by separating the introduction of the gaseous reactants, cannot be achieved in a single species system.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to a method of growing a thin film onto a substrate. The method comprises feeding a single gaseous precursor into a reaction space. The precursor is caused to adsorb onto the surface of the substrate to form a layer. A catalyst is then fed into the reaction space in an amount to substantially convert the layer of the precursor into the desired thin film. Embodiments of the present invention overcome the shortcomings of previously available CVD and ALD methods.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

It is now proposed to employ a catalyst in a process that employs a single gaseous precursor in such a manner that the precise layer thickness control of the ALD process can be obtained. Specifically, the process comprises the steps of introducing a single gaseous precursor into a reaction chamber under conditions such that a portion of the precursor adsorbs on the substrate and subsequently converting the adsorbed precursor to the desired thin film through the use of a suitable catalyst.

As illustrative of the present invention, reference is made once again to the creation of a thin film of copper metal on a substrate through the use of the precursor hfac-Cu-TMVS.

The copper film is produced pursuant to the following reaction:

It is known that water will catalytically promote this reaction. As such, the present invention contemplates introducing the precursor hfac-Cu-TMVS, into a reaction chamber, generally maintained at low pressure, causing the precursor to adsorb onto the substrate, which may be heated and which is located within the reaction chamber. Like in an ALD process, the adsorption may take place by means of chemisorbing an exact monolayer of the precursor onto the substrate. Formation of a monolayer in this manner will produce the type of precise layer control characteristic of an ALD process. On the other hand, it is also possible to carry out the claimed method under conditions in which the precursor physisorbs onto the substrate. When the precursor physisorbs onto the substrate, layer thickness control may be achieved, for example, by controlling the amount of precursor introduced into the reaction chamber. It is to be appreciated that the substrate temperature may be modified to facilitate the appropriate type of adsorption, which may differ for different applications of the claimed process.

After the precursor adsorbs onto the substrate in the appropriate manner, a catalyst is introduced into the chamber. The catalyst is chosen so that the adsorbed precursor reacts to form the desired thin film at the substrate temperature. The use of a catalyst allows the film formation reaction to occur at lower temperatures, so that the problem of high temperature desorption of the precursor can be ameliorated. Where the precursor is hfac-Cu-TMVS, a suitable catalyst is water. The introduction of water lowers the temperature required for hfac-Cu-TMVS to decompose into elemental copper. Specifically, the addition of water allows the substrate temperature to be less than about 150.degree. C., and possibly as low as 100.degree. C. The addition of a catalyst with a single precursor allows the deposition process to be carried out at temperatures low enough to prevent desorption of the precursor, yet high enough, due to the addition of the catalyst, to permit the film-formation reaction. Thus it is possible to extend some of the advantages of ALD to a single precursor system, while overcoming the disadvantages of prior art techniques.

The precursor and the catalyst may be introduced into the reaction chamber by any appropriate method. For example, the precursor could be introduced in the form of a gaseous stream of pure precursor, or the precursor entrained within a flow of a carrier gas. Similarly, the catalyst could be introduced alone or mixed with a carrier gas. The choice of carrier gas would be dictated by the precursor and catalyst chemistries. For the example system of hfac-Cu-TMVS and water, examples of suitable carrier gases are H.sub.2, Ar and N.sub.2.

After the precursor is adsorbed onto the substrate surface, but before the introduction of the catalyst into the reactor, if any excess non-adsorbed precursor exists, it may be removed from the proximity of the substrate. This removal of the precursor may be desirable in order to control the amount of precursor adsorbing on the substrate, or to prevent the precursor from reacting in the gas phase when catalyst is introduced into the reactor. In an alternative embodiment of the claimed method, however, precursor may continue to be introduced into the reaction chamber while the catalyst is introduced. This embodiment may be useful when the stoichiometry of the deposition reaction requires more than one precursor molecule. For example, in the deposition of copper from hfac-Cu-TMVS, two molecules of the precursor are needed to apply a single molecule of copper. As such, introducing additional precursor with the water catalyst encourages production of the final film.

When it is desired to remove excess or non-adsorbed precursor from the proximity of the substrate before introduction of the catalyst, any suitable method may be used to accomplish the removal. For example, the precursor could be removed by evacuating the reaction chamber with a vacuum pump. Alternatively, removal could occur by purging the reaction chamber with a gas. The purge could consist of flowing the gas between the introduction into the reaction chamber of flows of pure precursor and catalyst, or the purge could consist of flowing just the carrier gas while ceasing to introduce precursor or catalyst into the flow of carrier gas. The gas could be an inert gas such as Ar and N.sub.2, or a gas that is not necessarily inert such as H.sub.2. It is to be appreciated that when the precursor is removed by purging the reaction chamber, the extent of the purge may be varied. In other words, in some embodiments it may be desirable to purge the reaction chamber with a sufficient volume of purge gas so that the excess precursor, if any, is essentially completely removed from the reaction chamber. The volume of purge gas could be adjusted by varying the purge gas volumetric flow rate, the amount of time the purge gas flows through the reactor, or by varying the reactor pressure. In alternative embodiments, a smaller volume of purge gas could be used to remove the precursor from each localized area of the substrate before the catalyst arrives at that localized area. Using a smaller volume of purge gas in this manner could reduce the cycle time required for the process.

After the desired film-formation reactions have occurred, it may be desirable to remove the catalyst and any reaction products from the proximity of the substrate. The same removal techniques described above are also suitable for removing the catalyst and reaction products from the reaction chamber. The above sequence of steps, namely, the introduction of the precursor, the optional removal of excess precursor, introduction of catalyst, and the optional removal of catalyst and reaction products, may be repeated to achieve the desired film thickness.

An apparatus useful in carrying out the proposed method could be the same apparatuses generally employed in the formation of thin films by CVD or by ALD. For example, the exemplary process for copper deposition can be carried out on an xZ-series CVD reactor, which is marketed by Applied Materials, Inc. of Santa Clara, Calif.

It should be noted that although the present invention has been described with respect to the precursor, hfac-Cu-TMVS, employed together with water as the catalyst, this example is intended to be merely illustrative of the present invention directed to method of cyclically introducing a precursor and a catalyst into a reaction chamber in order to create a suitable film.

Although the present invention has been illustrated using a specific embodiment, the invention is not meant to be so limited. It is intended that the present invention be defined solely by the appended claims.

*