Senior Fitness - Exercise and Nutrition for Aging Men and Women
FREE Article Feed for your website.
Home Ownership Magazine
Party Planning Information
Article Marketing Resources
Bio-Medical Research Article Database
Informative Articles on Life, Love and Happiness
Tutorials on Business to Writing
Famous Quotes from Famous People
Song Lyric Information
New US Patent Information
Comprehensive List of Content by Category
Online Auctions and Shopping Related Articles
Article Search
Most Recent Articles
Title: Wireless network load generator dynamic MAC hardware address manipulation
Patent Number: 7,436,831 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Miller,   et al.

Title: Method and apparatus for wire-speed application layer classification of upstream and downstream data packets
Patent Number: 7,436,830 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Ben-Nun,   et al.

Title: Methods and apparatus for reconfiguring packets to have varying sizes and latencies
Patent Number: 7,436,829 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Chen,   et al.

Title: Method and apparatus for label switching data packets
Patent Number: 7,436,828 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Betts,   et al.

Title: Data bearers in a communication system
Patent Number: 7,436,827 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Greis,   et al.

Title: System and method for detecting and indicating communication protocols
Patent Number: 7,436,826 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Celebioglu,   et al.

Title: Method and apparatus for distinguishing between services of all frequency bands and specific frequency band
Patent Number: 7,436,825 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Jeong,   et al.

Title: Distributed switch architecture including a growth input/output bus structure
Patent Number: 7,436,824 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Pepenella

Title: Method for transmitting data
Patent Number: 7,436,823 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Laumen,   et al.

Title: Method and apparatus for the estimation of total transmission delay by statistical analysis of conversational behavior
Patent Number: 7,436,822 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Lee,   et al.

Title: Method and apparatus for providing fault tolerance to intelligent voice-over-IP endpoint terminals
Patent Number: 7,436,820 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Beck,   et al.

Title: Communication apparatus and control method thereof
Patent Number: 7,436,819 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Ezumi

Title: Packet switched network voice communication
Patent Number: 7,436,818 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Nakhla,   et al.

Title: Call clearing for legacy mobile circuit switched domain wireless systems
Patent Number: 7,436,817 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Bienn,   et al.

Title: Method and system for transmission-based billing of applications
Patent Number: 7,436,816 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Mehta,   et al.

Title: Switching system and method having low, deterministic latency
Patent Number: 7,436,815 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Caldara

Title: Selecting transport addresses to route streams between endpoints
Patent Number: 7,436,814 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Bell

Title: Method and system for acquiring time synchronization between base stations in a broadband wireless access communication system
Patent Number: 7,436,813 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Kim,   et al.

Title: System for oderwire modulation
Patent Number: 7,436,812 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Geile

Title: Multicasting data method in a radio communication system
Patent Number: 7,436,811 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Putcha,   et al.

Title: Determination of wireless link quality for routing as a function of predicted delivery ratio
Patent Number: 7,436,810 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Ma,   et al.

Title: Communicating system, communicating method, base station, and mobile station
Patent Number: 7,436,809 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Harada,   et al.

Title: Method and apparatus for bandwidth reservations
Patent Number: 7,436,808 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Geva,   et al.

Title: Communication network
Patent Number: 7,436,807 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Hanninen,   et al.

Title: Apparatus and method for symbol mapping TFCI bits for a hard split mode in a CDMA mobile communication system
Patent Number: 7,436,806 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Hwang,   et al.

Title: Method for call establishment over a packet exchange network
Patent Number: 7,436,805 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Yokota,   et al.

Title: Methods and apparatus for using a Care of Address option
Patent Number: 7,436,804 Issued on 10/14/2008 to O'Neill

Title: Apparatus and method for determining a soft handover in a CDMA mobile communication system
Patent Number: 7,436,803 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Chae,   et al.

Title: Frequency hopping method in orthogonal frequency division multiplexing system
Patent Number: 7,436,802 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Lee,   et al.

Title: Deferred access method for uplink packet channel
Patent Number: 7,436,801 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Kanterakis

Title: Radio communication scheme
Patent Number: 7,436,800 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Toshimitsu,   et al.

Title: Method for minimizing expenditures associated with optimized backhaul networks
Patent Number: 7,436,799 Issued on 10/14/2008 to El-Sayed,   et al.

Title: Communication system, communication terminal apparatus, wireless key apparatus and program
Patent Number: 7,436,798 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Itoh,   et al.

Title: Wireless architecture and support for process control systems
Patent Number: 7,436,797 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Shepard,   et al.

Title: Mobile-unit-dedicated data delivery assistance method
Patent Number: 7,436,796 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Takeuchi,   et al.

Title: Timer based stall avoidance mechanism for high speed wireless communication system
Patent Number: 7,436,795 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Jiang

Title: Transmission power control method and apparatus for mobile communication system
Patent Number: 7,436,794 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Takahashi,   et al.

Title: System and method for effectively performing a transmit power adjustment procedure
Patent Number: 7,436,793 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Read

Title: For-fee distribution of consumer-selected content items between different satellite radio service providers
Patent Number: 7,436,792 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Diamond

Title: Methods and apparatus for providing slot reservations for slotted messages in wireless communication networks
Patent Number: 7,436,791 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Willey,   et al.

Title: Wireless access point methods and apparatus for reduced power consumption and cost
Patent Number: 7,436,790 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Todd,   et al.

Title: Ad Hoc wireless node and network
Patent Number: 7,436,789 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Caliskan,   et al.

Title: Dynamic frequency spectrum re-allocation
Patent Number: 7,436,788 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Huschke,   et al.

Title: Transceiver for full duplex communication systems
Patent Number: 7,436,787 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Huang,   et al.

Title: Telecommunications system for minimizing the effect of white noise data packets for the generation of required white noise on transmission channel utilization
Patent Number: 7,436,786 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Ban

Title: Method and system for location based subject matter teleconferencing
Patent Number: 7,436,785 Issued on 10/14/2008 to McMullen,   et al.

Title: Resilient packet ring network for realizing MAC bridging
Patent Number: 7,436,784 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Hashimoto

Title: Method and apparatus for detecting a router that improperly responds to ARP requests
Patent Number: 7,436,783 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Cheshire,   et al.

Title: Full mesh LSP and full mesh T-LDP provisioning between provider edge routers in support of Layer-2 and Layer-3 virtual private network services
Patent Number: 7,436,782 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Ngo,   et al.

Title: Method and apparatus for determining the location of a node in a wireless system
Patent Number: 7,436,781 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Niu,   et al.

Title: Method and apparatus for approximating location of node attached to a network
Patent Number: 7,436,780 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Stephens,   et al.

Title: Method and system for controlling when a radio link layer connection to a wireless terminal is released
Patent Number: 7,436,779 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Mangal,   et al.

Title: Related-packet identification
Patent Number: 7,436,778 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Iannaccone,   et al.

Title: Failed link training
Patent Number: 7,436,777 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Lesartre

Title: Communication test device
Patent Number: 7,436,776 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Koga

Title: Software configurable cluster-based router using stock personal computers as cluster nodes
Patent Number: 7,436,775 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Jordan,   et al.

Title: Communication network connection rerouting methods and systems
Patent Number: 7,436,774 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Gunther,   et al.

Title: Packet flow control in switched full duplex ethernet networks
Patent Number: 7,436,773 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Cunningham

Title: Available bandwidth estimation
Patent Number: 7,436,772 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Padhye,   et al.

Title: System for refining network utilization and data block sizes in the transfer of data over a network
Patent Number: 7,436,771 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Roberts,   et al.

Title: Metering packet flows for limiting effects of denial of service attacks
Patent Number: 7,436,770 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Sterne,   et al.

Title: Method of throttling data flow through a router
Patent Number: 7,436,769 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Loader,   et al.

Title: Method, apparatus and computer program for transmitting a packet
Patent Number: 7,436,768 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Yun

Title: Method and apparatus for controlling the transmission of cells across a network
Patent Number: 7,436,767 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Wei

Title: Telecommunication network support for service based policy in roaming configurations
Patent Number: 7,436,766 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Alfano,   et al.

Title: Method and apparatus for dynamically allocating upstream bandwidth in passive optical networks
Patent Number: 7,436,765 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Sisto,   et al.

Title: Notification of control information in wireless communication system
Patent Number: 7,436,764 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Lee,   et al.

Title: Data communication apparatus with a dual mode protection switching system
Patent Number: 7,436,763 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Phelps,   et al.

Title: Mobile communication network system for managing the location of a mobile IP terminal
Patent Number: 7,436,762 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Oka,   et al.

Title: Apparatus and method for connecting fibre channel devices via bypass buffers
Patent Number: 7,436,761 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Winter,   et al.

Title: Method for reading sensor
Patent Number: 7,436,760 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Chen

Title: Reception apparatus and method, and channel response measurement apparatus for receiving an orthogonal frequency divisional multiplexing signal
Patent Number: 7,436,759 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Hayashi,   et al.

Title: Apparatus and method for transmitting/receiving pilot pattern set to distinguish base station in orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) communication system
Patent Number: 7,436,758 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Suh,   et al.

Title: Scattered pilot and filtering for channel estimation
Patent Number: 7,436,757 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Wilson,   et al.

Title: Record carrier and apparatus enabling seamless playback
Patent Number: 7,436,756 Issued on 10/14/2008 to Bernsen

System of and method for decoding trellis codes Number:6,973,615 from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) owispatent

Home    Author Login    Submit Article    Article Search    Add Your Link    Edit Your Link    Contact Us    Advertising    Disclaimer

   

 
Web LinkGrinder.com

Top Breaking News
     Greek, Cypriot Leaders Resume Unification Talks in Nicosia by Nathan Morley
     Indonesia Tobacco Sales Grow, Raising Health Fears
     South Korea Allows Top Defector to Travel Overseas by VOA News

Title: System of and method for decoding trellis codes

Abstract: Systems and related methods are described for (1) determining one or more state probabilities for one or more states in a trellis representation; (2) determining an estimate of or extrinsic output for a bit using a trellis representation; (3) performing a MAX* 2->1 operation; and (4) computing forward state probabilities in a forward mode of operation and computing backward state probabilities in a backward mode of operation. Combinations of the foregoing are also described.

Patent Number: 6,973,615 Issued on 12/06/2005 to Arad,   et al.


Inventors: Arad; Eran (Misgav, IL); Dalumi; Efraim (Misgav, IL); Kons; Shachar (Haifa, IL); Eidson; Donald B. (San Diego, CA)
Assignee: Conexant Systems, Inc. (Newport Beach, CA)
Appl. No.: 013490
Filed: December 13, 2001

Current U.S. Class: 714/792
Intern'l Class: H03M 013/03
Field of Search: 714/786,755,791-796 375/341,262


References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
5181209Jan., 1993Hagenauer et al.
5537444Jul., 1996Nill et al.
5541955Jul., 1996Jacobsmeyer.
5844946Dec., 1998Nagayasu.
5933462Aug., 1999Viterbi et al.
6023783Feb., 2000Divsalar et al.
6219388Apr., 2001Tanada et al.
6563877May., 2003Abbaszadeh.
6597743Jul., 2003Khayrallah et al.


Other References

Pietrobon, S.S., Implementation and Performance of a Turbo/Map Decoder, International Journal of Satellite Communications, vol. 16, pp. 23-46 (1998).
Robertson, P. and Worz, T., Extensions of Turbo Trellis Coded Modulation to High Bandwidth Efficiencies, Institute for Communication Technology, pp. 1251-1255 (1997).
Cherubini, G. and Olcer, S., Concatenated Coding for Binary Partial-Response Channels, Zurich Research Laboratory, IBM Research Division, pp. 1789-1794 (1994).
Bahl, L. R., et al., Optimal Decoding of Linear Codes for Minimizing Symbol Error Rate; IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Mar. 1974, pp. 284-287.
Benedetto, S. and Montorsi, G., Serial concatenation of block and convolutional codes, Electronics Letters, vol. 32, No. 10, May 1996, pp. 887-888.
Benedetto, S. and Montorsi, G., Iterative decoding of serially concatenated convolutional codes; Electronics Letters, vol. 32, No. 13, Jun. 1996, pp. 1186-1188.
Benedetto, S., et al., A Soft-Input Soft-Output Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) Module to Decode Parallel and Serial Concatenated Codes; TDA Progress Report 42-127, Nov. 1996, pp. 1-20.
Benedetto, S. et al., Serial Concatenated Trellis Coded Modulation with Iterative Decoding: Design and Performance, submitted to IEEE Comm. Theory Mini Conference 97 (Globecom 97), pp. 38-43.
Benedetto, S., and Divsalar, D., Turbo Codes: Analysis, Design, Iterative Decoding and Applications, Course 909, Part II, International Courses for Telecom and Semiconductor Professionals, Oct. 25-29, 1999, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 324-339.
Berrou, C., et al., Near Shannon Limit Error—Correcting Coding and Decoding: Turbo-Codes (1); IEEE, 1993, pp. 1064-1070.
Divsalar, D. and Pollara, F., Serial and Hydrid Concatenated Codes with Applications; Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, pp. 1-8.
Divsalar, D. and Pollara, F., Turbo Trellis Coded Modulation with Iterative Decoding for Mobile Satellite Communications; Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, pp. 1-7.
Divsalar, D., et al., Serial Turbo Trellis Coded Modulation with Rate-1 Inner Code, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Jun. 2000, p. 194.
Divsalar, D., et al., Serial Concatenated Trellis Coded Modulation with Rate-1 Inner Code, IEEE, 2000, pp. 777-782.
Hagenauer, J. and Hoeher, P., A Viterbi Algorithm with Soft-Decision Outputs and its Applications; Proceedings of IEEE Globecom '89; Dallas, Texas, Nov. 1989; pp. 47.1.1-47.1.7.
Hoeher, Peter and Lodge, John, "Turbo DPSK": Iterative Differential PSK Demodulation and Channel Decoding; IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 47, No. 6, Jun. 1999, pp. 837-843.
Narayanan, K. R. and Stüber, G. L., A Serial Concatenation Approach to Iterative Demodulation and Decoding; IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 47, No. 7, Jul. 1999, pp. 956-961.
Nill, C. and Sundberg, C.W., List and Soft Symbol Output Viterbi Algorithms: Extensions and Comparisons, IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 43, Nos. 2/3/4, Feb./Mar./Apr., pp. 277-287.
Peleg, M. et al., On Interleaved, Differentially Encoded Convolutional Codes, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 45, No. 7, Nov. 1999, pp. 2572-2582.
Robertson, P., et al., A Comparison of Optimal and Sub-Optimal MAP Decoding Algorithms Operating in the Log Domain; IEEE, 1995, pp. 1009-1013.
Viterbi, A., An Intuitive Justification and a Simplified Implementation of the MAP Decoder for Convolutional Codes; IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 16, No. 2, Feb. 1998, pp. 260-264.

Primary Examiner: Chase; Shelly
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Howrey LLP

Parent Case Text



This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/386,197, filed Nov. 13, 2001, U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/327,257, filed Oct. 4, 2001, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/255,874, filed Dec. 15, 2000, each of which is hereby fully incorporated by reference herein as though set forth in full.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is related to co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/013,492, filed on even date herewith, U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/386,182 Nov. 13, 2001 U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/327,258, filed Oct. 4, 2001, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/255,797, filed Dec. 15, 2000, each of which is owned in common by the assignee hereof, and each of which is hereby fully incorporated by reference herein as though set forth in full.

SUMMARY

The invention provides ba system for determining one or more state probabilities for one or more states in a trellis representation. In one embodiment of the system, branch metric logic determines branch metrics for one or more of the branches between one or more states in a first portion of the trellis and one or more states in a second portion of the trellis, and state probability logic determines state probabilities for one or more of the states. In one embodiment, the system concurrently normalizes the one or more state probabilities responsive to assertion of a normalization control signal. In one implementation, the state probability logic determines a state probability for a state by deriving branch values for one or more branches exiting or entering the state, and then derives the state probability by performing a group operation on the branch values. In one implementation example, the group operation is the MAX* operation.

In a second embodiment, the state probability logic comprises p state probability logic modules for determining in parallel state probabilities for each of p states, where p is an integer of two or more. In one embodiment, the system concurrently normalizes the one or more state probabilities responsive to assertion of a normalization control signal.

The invention also provides a system for determining an estimate of or extrinsic output for each of one or more bits. In one embodiment, the system iterates for each of the bits. In this embodiment, during a particular iteration, the system derives state values for each of one or more states in a trellis representation, where the state value for a state is derived from the forward state probability and the backward state probability for the state. Then, it derives a first value by performing a group operation on the state values for each of the states which imply release of a logical "1" for the bit, and second value by performing a group operation on the state values for each of the states which imply release of a logical "0" for the bit. It then derives an estimate of or extrinsic output for the bit from the first and second values. In one implementation, the group operation is the MAX* operator. In one implementation example, the system derives an estimate of the bit by subtracting the second value from the first and comparing the difference with a threshold of 0. If the difference equals or exceeds the threshold, the estimate is taken to be a logical "1". If the difference is less than the threshold, the estimate is taken to be a logical "0".

In a second embodiment, during a particular iteration, the system derives a branch values for each of one or more branches in the trellis representation, where the branch value for a branch is derived from the forward state probability of the originating state for the branch, the branch metric for the branch, the backward state probability for the terminating state of the branch, and, possibly, the a priori probability. The system derives a first value by performing a group operation on the branch values for each of the branches which imply release of a logical "1", and a second value by performing a group operation on the branch values for each of the branches which imply release of a logical "0". It then derives the estimate or extrinsic output for the bit from the first and second values. In one implementation, the group operator is the MAX* operator. In one implementation example, the system derives an extrinsic output for the bit from the difference between the first and second values.

The invention further provides a system for computing the MAX* of operands A and B. In one embodiment, first logic in the system tests the difference A-B relative to zero, and outputs a signal indicative thereof.

Second logic in the system determines the maximum of the operands A and B, MAX(A,B), by outputting a signal representative of the operand A if the signal from the first logic indicates that the difference A-B is greater than zero, and outputs a signal representative of the operand B otherwise.

Third logic in the system outputs a value corresponding to ln(1+exp(-|A-B|)). Fourth logic derives the output of the system from the sum of the outputs of the second and third logic while normalizing the output responsive to assertion of a normalization control signal.

The invention further provides a system for computing one or more state probabilities for the states in a trellis representation. This trellis representation has one or more branches between one or more states in a first portion of the trellis and one or more branches in a second portion of the trellis.

In one embodiment, branch metric logic in the system computes one or more branch metrics for one or more of the branches, and indication logic in the system indicates whether the system is configured to compute forward state probabilities or backward state probabilities.

State probability logic in the system (1) computes one or more forward state probabilities of one or more states in the second portion of the trellis, while normalizing the state probabilities responsive to assertion of a normalization control signal, provided the indication logic indicates the system is configured to compute forward state probabilities; and (2) computes one or more backward state probabilities of one or more states in the first portion of the trellis, while normalizing the state probabilities responsive to assertion of a control signal, provided the indication logic is configured to compute backward state probabilities.

In one implementation example, the system is part of a log-MAP decoder, and there are five states in the trellis at a time. In this implementation example, each branch is associated with one encoder input bit and two encoder output bits. Moreover, only two branches enter and exit each of the states at a time. A total of 64 branches correspond to a particular portion of the trellis.

In this implementation example, there are 32 instances of state probability logic, one for each of the 32 states in the trellis. Each instance may be configured to operate in a forward mode or a backward mode.

When the state probability logic for a particular state is configured to operate in the backward mode, the backward state probability for the state may be computed by first determining for each of the two branches exiting the state a branch value equal to the sum of the backward state probability of the terminating state of the branch and the branch metric for the branch. The backward state probability for the state is then derived from the MAX* of the branch values for each of the two branches exiting the state.

Similarly, when the state probability logic for a particular state is configured to operate in the forward mode, the forward state probability for the state may be computed by first determining for each of the two branches entering the state a branch value equal to the sum of the forward state probability of the originating state of the branch and the branch metric for the branch. The forward state probability for the state is then derived from the MAX* of the branch values for each the two branches entering the state.

Meanwhile, normalization control logic is configured to evaluate the most significant bits of the 64 branch values which are computed by the 32 renderings of the state probability logic at a time. If the most significant bits of any one of these 64 branch values equals or exceeds a constant, a normalization control signal is asserted. Responsive to the assertion of this normalization control signal, the 32 renderings of the state probability logic are configured to concurrently normalize the state probabilities.

In this implementation example, once the forward and backward state probabilities for a portion of the trellis have been computed, estimation logic is configured to determine an estimate of the encoder input bit associated with a particular portion of the trellis. In this implementation example, because of the code structure, all the branches entering the first 16 states of the trellis imply release of a logical "1" for the bit, and all the branches entering the next 16 states of the trellis imply release of a logical "0" for the bit. In this implementation, a state value is derived for each of the states equal to the sum of the forward and backward state probabilities for the state. A first value is then derived from the MAX* of the state values for the first 16 states of the trellis, and a second value is derived from the MAX* of the state values for the next 16 states of the trellis. The second value is then subtracted from the first value, and the resulting difference compared with a threshold of 0. If the difference equals or exceeds the threshold, the estimate is taken to be a logical "1". If the difference is less than the threshold, the estimate is taken to be a logical "0".

Also in this implementation example, once the forward and backward state probabilities for a particular portion of the trellis have been computed, extrinsic output logic is configured to determine an extrinsic output for each of the two encoder output bits associated with the particular portion of the trellis, one bit at time. In this implementation example, two iterations are performed, one for each of the two output bits. During a particular iteration, for each of the 64 branches that are present in the corresponding portion of the trellis, the system compute a branch value equal to the sum of the forward state probability of the originating state of the branch, the backward state probability of the terminating state of the branch, and the difference between the branch metric for the branch and the a priori probability for the bit.

A first value may then be derived from the MAX* of the branch values for each of the branches which imply release of a logical "1" for the bit in question, and a second value may be derived from the MAX* of the branch values for each of the branches which imply release of a logical "0" for the bit in question. The second value may be subtracted from the first to form an extrinsic output for the bit in question. This process may then repeated for the second encoder output bit.

Method counterparts to each of these systems are also provided. Other systems, methods, features and advantages of the invention will be or will become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following figures and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features and advantages be included within this description, be within the scope of the invention, and be protected by the accompanying claims.
Claims



1. A system for determining one or more state probabilities for one or more states in a trellis representation, the system comprising:

branch metric logic for determining one or more branch metrics for one or more branches between one or more states in a first portion of the trellis and one or more states in a second portion of the trellis; and

state probability logic for determining one or more state probabilities for one or more of the states, comprising:

first logic for determining for each of one or more branches a branch value, a branch connecting an originating state with a terminating state, the originating state having a forward state probability and the terminating state having a backward state probability, wherein a branch value for a branch is either the sum of the forward state probability of the originating state of the branch and the branch metric for the branch or the backward state probability of the terminating state of the branch and the branch metric for the branch; and

second logic for deriving a state probability for a state from a group operation performed on the branch values for one or more branches.

2. The system of claim 1 wherein the group operation is MAX*.

3. The system of claim 1 wherein a forward state probability for a state is derived from the MAX* of the branch values for each of the branches entering the state, wherein the branch value for a branch is the sum of the forward state probability of the originating state of the branch and the branch metric for the branch.

4. The system of claim 1 wherein a backward state probability for a state is derived from the MAX* of the branch values for each of the branches exiting the state, wherein the branch value for a branch is the sum of the backward state probability of the terminating state of the branch and the branch metric for the branch.

5. A system for determining one or more state probabilities for one or more states in a trellis representation, the system comprising:

branch metric logic for determining one or more branch metrics for one or more branches between one or more states in a first portion of the trellis and one or more states in a second portion of the trellis; and

state probability logic for determining one or more state probabilities for one or more of the states, comprising:

first logic for determining for each of one or more branches a branch value, a branch value for a branch being derived from one or more state probabilities and branch metric of the branch; and

second logic for deriving a state probability for a state from a group operation performed on the branch values for one or more branches,

wherein the state probability logic is configured to concurrently normalize state probabilities responsive to assertion of a normalization control signal.

6. The system of claim 5 further comprising normalization control logic for asserting the normalization control signal responsive to an evaluation of selected bits from one or more branch values.

7. The system of claim 6 wherein the normalization control logic is configured to assert the normalization control signal responsive to a comparison of the most significant bits of the one or more branch values with a predetermined threshold.

8. The system of claim 7 wherein the normalization control logic is configured to assert the normalization control signal responsive to an evaluation of the most significant bits of the branch values for each of the branches between the first and second portions of the trellis.

9. A system for determining one or more state probabilities for one or more states in a trellis representation, the system comprising:

branch metric means for determining one or more branch metrics for one or more branches between one or more states in a first portion of the trellis and one or more states in a second portion of the trellis; and

state probability means for determining one or more state probabilities for one or more of the states, comprising:

first means for determining branch values for each of one or more branches, a branch connecting an originating state with a terminating state, the originating state having a forward state probability and the terminating state having a backward state probability, wherein a branch value for a branch is either the sum of the forward state probability of the originating state of the branch and the branch metric for the branch or the backward state probability of the terminating state of the branch and the branch metric for the branch; and

second means for deriving a state probability for a state from a group operation performed on the branch values for one or more branches.

10. A system for determining one or more state probabilities for one or more states in a trellis representation, the system comprising:

branch metric logic for determining one or more branch metrics for one or more branches between one or more states in a first portion of the trellis and one or more states in a second portion of the trellis; and

a plurality p of state probability logic modules for determining in parallel state probabilities for each of p states in either the first or second portions of the trellis, where p is an integer of two or more, each of the p modules comprising:

first logic for determining for each of one or more branches a branch value, a branch connecting an originating state with a terminating state, the originating state having a forward state probability and the terminating state having a backward state probability, wherein a branch value for a branch is either the sum of the forward state probability of the originating state of the branch and the branch metric for the branch or the backward state probability of the terminating state of the branch and the branch metric for the branch; and

second logic for deriving a state probability for the state corresponding to the module from a group operation performed on the branch values for one or more branches.

11. A system for determining one or more state probabilities for one or more states in a trellis representation, the system comprising:

branch metric logic for determining one or more branch metrics for one or more branches between one or more states in a first portion of the trellis and one or more states in a second portion of the trellis; and

a plurality p of state probability logic modules for determining in parallel state probabilities for each of p states in either the first or second portions of the trellis, where p is an integer of two or more, each of the p modules comprising:

first logic for determining for each of one or more branches a branch value, a branch value for a branch being derived from one or more state probabilities and a branch metric for the branch; and

second logic for deriving a state probability for the state corresponding to the module from a group operation performed on the branch values for one or more branches,

wherein one or more of the state probability logic modules are configured to concurrently normalize state probabilities of one or more states responsive to assertion of a normalization control signal.

12. The system of claim 11 further comprising normalization control logic configured to assert the normalization control signal responsive to an evaluation of selected bits from the branch values of one or more branches.

13. The system of claim 12 wherein the normalization control logic is configured to assert the normalization control signal responsive to a comparison of the most significant bits of the branch values for each of one or more branches between the first and second portions of the trellis with a predetermined threshold.

14. A system for determining estimates of or extrinsic outputs for one or more bits using a trellis representation, the trellis representation comprising one or more branches between one or more states, with one or more of the states having forward and backward state probabilities, with one or more of the branches having branch metrics, and with all the branches terminating at a state implying release of the same value so that the state also implies release of the value, the system comprising:

first logic for deriving a state value for each of one or more states, a state value for a state being derived from the forward state probability of the state and the backward state probability of the state;

second logic for deriving a first value by performing a group operation on the state values for the one or more of the states which imply release of a logical '1' for a bit;

third logic for deriving a second value by performing a group operation on the state values for the one or more of the states which imply release of a logical '0' for the bit; and

fourth logic for deriving an estimate of or extrinsic output for the bit from the first and second values.

15. The system of claim 14 wherein the fourth logic derives an estimate of the bit by comparing the first and second values for the bit with a predetermined threshold.

16. The system of claim 14 wherein the group operation is the MAX* operation.

17. The system of claim 14 which is configured to iterate r times, wherein r is an integer of one or more, for each of r bits.

18. The system of claim 14 wherein the states which imply release of a logical '1' for the bit are a predetermined first grouping of states, and the states which imply release of a logical '0' for the bit are a predetermined second grouping of states.

19. A system for determining an estimate of or extrinsic output for one or more bits using a trellis representation, the trellis representation comprising one or more branches between one or more states, with one or more of the states having forward and backward state probabilities, with one or more of the branches having branch metrics, and with all the branches terminating at a state implying release of the same value so that the state also implies release of the value, the system comprising:

first means for deriving a state value for each of one or more states, a state value for a state being derived from the forward state probability of the state and the backward state probability of the state;

second means for deriving a first value by performing a group operation on the state values for one or more of the states which imply release of a logical '1' for a bit;

third means for deriving a second value by performing a group operation on the state values for one or more of the states which imply release of a logical '0' for the bit; and fourth means for deriving an estimate of the bit from the first and second values.

20. The system of claim 19 wherein the fourth means derives an estimate of a bit by comparing the difference between the first and second values with a predetermined threshold.

21. A system for determining an estimate of or extrinsic output for one or more bits using a trellis representation, the trellis representation comprising one or more branches between one or more branches between one or more states, with one or more states having forward and backward state probabilities, and one or more branches having branch metrics, with all the branches connecting a particular originating and terminating state implying release of the same value, the system comprising:

first logic for determining branch values for each of one or more branches, a branch value for a branch being derived from one or more state probabilities, and the branch metric for the branch;

second logic for determining a first value by performing a group operation on the branch values for the branches which imply release of a logical "1" for the bit;

third logic for determining a second value by performing a group operation on the branch values for the branches which imply release of a logical "0" for the bit; and

fourth logic for deriving an estimate or extrinsic output for the bit from the first and second values.

22. The system of claim 21 wherein the first logic is configured to determine a branch value for a branch from an a priori probability for the bit.

23. The system of claim 22 wherein the first logic is configured to determine a branch value for a branch from the sum of the forward state probability of the originating state of the branch, the backward state probability of the terminating state of the branch, and the difference between the branch metric for the branch and the a priori probability for the bit.

24. The system of claim 21 configured to iterate s times, where s is an integer of one or more, for each of s bits.

25. The system of claim 21 wherein the fourth logic is configured to determine an extrinsic output for the bit from the difference between the first and second values.

26. A system for determining an estimate of or extrinsic output for one or more bits using a trellis representation, the trellis representation comprising one or more branches between one or more branches between one or more states, with one or more states having forward and backward state probabilities, and one or more branches having branch metrics, with all the branches connecting a particular originating and terminating state implying release of the same value, the system comprising:

first means for determining branch values for each of one or more branches, a branch value for a branch being derived from one or more state probabilities, and the branch metric for the branch;

second means for determining a first value by performing a group operation on the branch values for the branches which imply release of a logical "1" for the bit;

third means for determining a second value by performing a group operation on the branch values for the branches which imply release of a logical "0" for the bit; and

fourth means for deriving an estimate or extrinsic output for the bit from the first and second values.

27. A system for computing the MAX* of operands A and B comprising:

first logic for testing the difference A-B relative to zero, and outputting a signal indicative thereof;

second logic for determining the maximum of the operands A and B, MAX(A,B), by outputting a signal representative of the operand A if the signal from the first logic indicates that the difference A-B is greater than zero, and outputting a signal representative of the operand B otherwise;

third logic for outputting a value corresponding to ln(1+exp(-|A-B|)); and

fourth logic for adding the outputs of the second and third logic, subtracting a predetermined normalization value responsive to assertion of a normalization control signal, and outputting a signal indicative thereof.

28. A system for computing the MAX* of operands A and B comprising:

first means for testing the difference A-B relative to zero, and outputting a signal indicative thereof;

second means for determining the maximum of the operands A and B, MAX(A,B), by outputting a signal representative of the operand A if the signal from the first logic indicates that the difference A-B is greater than zero, and outputting a signal representative of the operand B otherwise;

third means for outputting a value corresponding to ln(1+exp(-|A-B|)); and

fourth means for adding the outputs of the second and third logic, subtracting a predetermined normalization value responsive to assertion of a normalization control signal, and outputting a signal indicative thereof.

29. A system for computing one or more state probabilities in a trellis representation comprising one or more branches between one or more states in a first portion of the trellis representation and one or more branches in a second portion of the trellis representation, the system comprising:

branch metric logic for computing one or more branch metrics for one or more of the branches;

indication logic for indicating whether the system is configured to compute forward state probabilities or backward state probabilities;

state probability logic for (1) computing one or more forward state probabilities for one or more states in the second portion of the trellis, while concurrently normalizing the forward state probabilities responsive to assertion of a normalization control signal; or (2) computing one or more backward state probabilities of one or more states in the first portion of the trellis, while concurrently normalizing the backward state probabilities responsive to assertion of a normalization control signal.

30. The system of claim 29 further comprising estimation logic for computing estimates of each of r bits, where r is an integer of one or more.

31. The system of claim 30 wherein the estimation logic is activated only when the system is configured to compute forward state probabilities.

32. The system of claim 29 further comprising extrinsic output logic for computing an extrinsic output for each of s bits, where s is an integer of one or more.

33. The system of claim 32 wherein the extrinsic output logic is activated only when the system is configured to compute forward state probabilities.

34. A system for computing one or more state probabilities in a trellis representation comprising one or more branches between one or more states in a first portion of the trellis representation and one or more branches in a second portion of the trellis representation, the system comprising:

branch metric means for computing one or more branch metrics for one or more of the branches;

indication means for indicating whether the system is configured to compute forward state probabilities or backward state probabilities;

state probability means for (1) computing one or more forward state probabilities for one or more states in the second portion of the trellis, while concurrently normalizing the forward state probabilities responsive to assertion of a normalization control signal; or (2) computing one or more backward state probabilities for one or more states in the first portion of the trellis, while concurrently normalizing the backward state probabilities responsive to assertion of a normalization control signal.

35. The system of claim 34 further comprising estimation means for computing an estimate of each of r bits, wherein r is an integer of one or more.

36. The system of claim 34 further comprising extrinsic output means for computing an extrinsic output for each of s bits, where s is an integer of one or more.

37. In decoding logic, a method of determining one or more state probabilities for one or more states in a trellis representation, the method comprising:

determining one or more branch metrics for one or more branches between one or more states in a first portion of the trellis and one or more states in a second portion of the trellis;

determining for each of one or more branches a branch value, a branch connecting an originating state with a terminating state, the originating state having a forward state probability and the terminating state having a backward state probability, wherein a branch value for a branch is either the sum of the forward state probability of the originating state of the branch and the branch metric for the branch or the backward state probability of the terminating state of the branch and the branch metric for the branch; and

deriving a state probability for a state from a group operation performed on the branch values for one or more branches.

38. The method of claim 37 wherein the group operation is MAX*.

39. The method of claim 37 wherein a forward state probability for a state is derived from the MAX* of the branch values for each of the branches entering the state, wherein a branch value for a branch is the sum of the forward state probability of the originating state of the branch and the branch metric for the branch.

40. The method of claim 37 wherein a backward state probability for a state is derived from the MAX* of the branch values for each of the branches exiting the state, wherein a branch value for a branch is the sum of the backward state probability of the terminating state of the branch and the branch metric for the branch.

41. In decoding logic, a method of determining one or more state probabilities for one or more states in a trellis representation, the method comprising:

determining one or more branch metrics for one or more branches between one or more states in a first portion of the trellis and one or more states in a second portion of the trellis;

determining for each of one or more branches a branch value derived from one or more state probabilities, and the branch metric for the branch;

deriving a state probability for a state from a group operation performed on the branch values for one or more branches; and

normalizing the one or more state probabilities responsive to assertion of a normalization control signal.

42. The method of claim 41 further comprising asserting the normalization control signal responsive to an examination of selected bits from the branch values of one or more of the branches.

43. The method of claim 42 further comprising asserting the normalization control signal responsive to a comparison of the most significant bits of the branch values with a predetermined threshold.

44. The method of claim 42 further comprising asserting the normalization control signal responsive to an evaluation of the most significant bits of the branch values for each of the branches between the first and second portions of the trellis.

45. In decoding logic, a method of determining one or more state probabilities for one or more states in a trellis representation, the method comprising:

a step for determining one or more branch metrics for one or more branches between one or more states in a first portion of the trellis and one or more states in a second portion of the trellis;

a step for deriving a branch value for each of one or more branches, a branch connecting an originating state with a terminating state, the originating state having a forward state probability and the terminating state having a backward state probability, wherein a branch value for a branch is either the sum of the forward state probability of the originating state of the branch and the branch metric for the branch or the backward state probability of the terminating state of the branch and the branch metric for the branch; and

a step for deriving a state probability for each of one or more states, the state probability for a state being derived from a group operation performed on the branch values of one or more branches.

46. In decoding logic, a method of determining one or more state probabilities for states in a trellis representation, the method comprising:

determining one or more branch metrics for one or more branches between one or more states in a first portion of the trellis and one or more states in a second portion of the trellis; and

determining in parallel state probabilities for each of p states, where p is an integer of two or more, by performing the following substeps in parallel for each of the p states:

determining for each of one or more branches a branch value a branch connecting an originating state with a terminating state, the originating state having a forward state probability and the terminating state having a backward state probability, wherein a branch value for a branch is either the sum of the forward state probability of the originating state of the branch and the branch metric for the branch or the backward state probability of the terminating state of the branch and the branch metric for the branch; and

deriving a state probability for the state from a group operation performed on the branch values for one or more branches.

47. In decoding logic, a method of determining one or more state probabilities for one or more states in a trellis representation, the method comprising:

a step for determining one or more branch metrics for one or more branches between one or more states in a first portion of the trellis and one or more states in a second portion of the trellis:

a step for deriving a branch value for each of one or more branches, the branch value for a branch being derived from one or more state probabilities and a branch metric for the branch;

a step for deriving a state probability for each of one or more states, the state probability for a state being derived from a group operation performed on the branch values of one or more branches; and

normalizing the state probabilities for each of the p states responsive to assertion of a normalization control signal.

48. The method of claim 47 further comprising asserting the normalization control signal responsive to an examination of selected bits for one or more of branch values.

49. The method of claim 48 further comprising asserting the normalization control signal responsive to examination of the most significant bits of the one or more branch values.

50. The method of claim 49 further comprising asserting the normalization control signal responsive to a comparison of the most significant bits of the branch values for each of the branches between the first and second portions of the trellis with a predetermined threshold.

51. In decoding logic, a method of determining an estimate or extrinsic output of one or more bits from a trellis representation, the trellis representation comprising one or more branches between one or more states, with one or more of the states having forward and backward state probabilities, and with one or more of the branches having branch metrics, with all the branches connecting a particular originating and terminating state implying release of the same value, the method comprising:

deriving a state value for each of one or more states, the state value for a state being derived from the forward state probability of the state and the backward state probability of the state;

deriving a first value by performing a group operation on the state values for one or more of the states which imply release of a logical '1' for a bit;

deriving a second value by performing a group operation on the state values for one or more of the states which imply release of a logical '0' for the bit; and

deriving an estimate of or extrinsic output for the bit from the first and second values.

52. The method of claim 51 further comprising deriving an estimate of a bit by comparing the first and second values with a predetermined threshold.

53. The method of claim 51 wherein the group operation is the MAX* operation.

54. The method of claim 51 further comprising performing r iterations of the method, wherein r is an integer of one or more, for each of r bits.

55. The method of claim 51 further comprising deriving the first value from a group operation performed on a predetermined first grouping of one or more states, and deriving the second value from a group operation performed on a predetermined second grouping of one or more states.

56. In decoding logic, a method of determining an estimate of or extrinsic output for one or more bits from a trellis representation, the trellis representation comprising one or more branches between one or more states, with one or more of the states having forward and backward state probabilities, and with one or more of the branches having branch metrics, with all the branches connecting a particular originating and terminating state implying release of the same value, the method comprising:

a step for deriving a state value for each of one or more states, the state value for a state being derived from the forward state probability of the state and the backward state probability of the state;

a step for deriving a first value by performing a group operation on the state values for one or more states which imply release of a logical '1' for a bit;

a step for deriving a second value by performing a group operation on the state values for one or more states which imply release of a logical '0' for the bit; and

a step for deriving an estimate of or extrinsic output for the bit from the first and second values.

57. In decoding logic, a method of determining an estimate of or extrinsic output for one or more bits using a trellis representation, the trellis representation comprising one or more branches between one or more branches between one or more states, with one or more states having forward and backward state probabilities, and one or more branches having branch metrics, with all the branches connecting a particular originating and terminating state implying release of the same value, the method comprising:

determining branch values for each of one or more branches, a branch value for a branch being derived from one or more state probabilities, and the branch metric for the branch;

determining a first value by performing a group operation on the branch values for the branches which imply release of a logical "1" for the bit;

determining a second value by performing a group operation on the branch values for the branches which imply release of a logical "0" for the bit; and

deriving an estimate or extrinsic output for the bit from the first and second values.

58. The method of claim 57 further comprising determining a branch value for a branch from an a priori probability for the bit.

59. The method of claim 57 further comprising performing s iterations of the method, where s is an integer of one or more, for each of s bits.

60. The method of claim 57 further comprising determining a branch value for a branch from the sum of the forward state probability of the originating state of the branch, the backward state probability of the terminating state of the branch, and the difference between the branch metric for the branch and the a priori probability for the bit.

61. The method of claim 57 further comprising determining an extrinsic output for the bit from the difference between the first and second values.

62. In decoding logic, a method of determining an estimate of or extrinsic output for one or more bits using a trellis representation, the trellis representation comprising one or more branches between one or more branches between one or more states, with one or more states having forward and backward state probabilities, and one or more branches having branch metrics, with all the branches connecting a particular originating and terminating state implying release of the same value, the method comprising:

a step for determining branch values for each of one or more branches, a branch value for a branch being derived from one or more state probabilities, and the branch metric for the branch;

a step for determining a first value by performing a group operation on the branch values for the branches which imply release of a logical "1" for the bit;

a step for determining a second value by performing a group operation on the branch values for the branches which imply release of a logical "0" for the bit; and

a step for deriving an estimate or extrinsic output for the bit from the first and second values.

63. In decoding logic, a method of computing the MAX* of operands A and B comprising:

testing the difference A-B relative to zero, and outputting a signal indicative thereof;

determining the maximum of the operands A and B, MAX(A,B), by outputting a signal representative of the operand A if the signal resulting from the testing step indicates that the difference A-B is greater than zero, and outputting a signal representative of the operand B otherwise;

outputting a value corresponding to ln(1+exp(-|A-B|));

adding the outputs of the second and third steps;

normalizing the sum responsive to assertion of a normalization control signal; and

outputting a signal representative of the normalized sum.

64. In decoding logic, a method of computing state probabilities for each of one or more states in a trellis representation comprising one or more branches between one or more states, the method comprising:

computing branch metrics for each of one or more branches;

indicating whether forward or backward operation is desired;

if forward operation is desired, computing forward state probabilities for each of one or more states, responsive to one or more state probabilities and one or more branch metrics; and

if backward operation is desired, computing one or more backward state probabilities of one or more states, responsive to one or more state probabilities and one or more branches metrics.

65. The method of claim 64 further comprising determining estimates of each of r bits, where r is an integer of one or more.

66. The method of claim 65 further comprising determining estimates of the r bits only when forward operation is indicated.

67. The method of claim 64 further comprising determining extrinsic outputs for each of s bits, where s is an integer of one or more.

68. The method of claim 67 further comprising determining extrinsic outputs for the s bits only when forward operation is desired.

69. The method of claim 64 further comprising normalizing one or more state probabilities responsive to assertion of a normalization control signal.

70. In decoding logic, a method of computing one or more state probabilities in a trellis representation comprising one or more branches between one or more states, the method comprising:

a step for computing one or more branch metrics for one or more of the branches;

a step for indicating whether forward or backward operation is desired;

a step for computing, if forward operation is desired, one or more forward state probabilities of one or more states; and

a step for computing, if backward operation is desired, one or more backward state probabilities of one or more states.

71. The method of claim 70 further comprising a step for determining estimates of each of r bits, where r is an integer of one or more.

72. The method of claim 71 further comprising a step for determining estimates of the r bits only when forward operation is desired.

73. The method of claim 70 further comprising a step for determining extrinsic outputs for each of s bits, where s is an integer of one or more.

74. The method of claim 73 further comprising a step for determining extrinsic outputs for the s bits only when forward operation is desired.

75. The methods of any of 64, and 70, tangibly embodied as a series of instructions stored on a processor readable medium.

76. A system comprising a processor and the medium of claim 75.

77. The methods of any of 64, and 70, tangibly embodied as logic.

78. The method of claim 70 further comprising normalizing one or more state probabilities responsive to assertion of a normalization control signal.

79. In decoding logic, a method of determining one or more state probabilities for one or more states in a trellis representation, the method comprising:

a step for determining one or more branch metrics for one or more branches between one or more states in a first portion of the trellis and one or more states in a second portion of the trellis;

a step for deriving a branch value for each of one or more branches, the branch value for a branch being derived from one or more state probabilities and a branch metric for the branch;

a step for deriving a state probability for each of one or more states, the state probability for a state being derived from a group operation performed on the branch values of one or more branches; and

a step for normalizing one or more state probabilities responsive to assertion of a normalization control signal.
Description



FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention generally relates to decoders, and, more specifically, to decoders of trellis codes.

RELATED ART

Trellis codes, such as convolutional codes, or parallel or series combinations or concatenations of convolutional codes, are codes which are decoded through use of a trellis. Trellis coded modulation (TCM) codes are groupings of trellis coded bits which result from mapping the bits into symbols, such as MPSK symbols, prior to transmission. The symbols may then be used to modulate a carrier, and the modulated carrier transmitted over a wireline or wireless interface. For additional information on trellis codes, such as serial or parallel concatenated convolutional codes, and TCM codes, such as serial concatenated trellis coded modulation codes (SCTCM) codes, please see U.S. Pat. No. 6,023,783; "Turbo Codes: Analysis, Design, Iterative Decoding and Applications," Course 909, Part II, International Courses for Telecom and Semiconductor Professionals, S. Benedetto & D. Divsalar, Oct. 25-29, 1999, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 324-339; "A Serial Concatenation Approach to Iterative Demodulation and Decoding," K. Narayanan et al., IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol. 47, No. 7, July 1999; "'Turbo DPSK': Iterative Differential PSK Demodulation and Channel Decoding," P. Hoeher et al., IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol. 47, No. 6, June 1999; "Serial and Hybrid Concatenated Codes with Applications," D. Divsalar et al., Proc. Int. Symp. Turbo Codes and Appls., Brest, France, September 1997, pp. 80-87; "Turbo Trellis Coded Modulation With Iterative Decoding for Mobile Satellite Communications," D. Divsalar et al., Proc. Int. Mobile Satellite Conf., June 1997; "Serial Concatenated Trellis Coded Modulation with Iterative Decoding: Design and Performance," submitted to IEEE Comm. Theory Mini Conference 97 (Globecom 97); "Near Shannon Limit Error-Correcting Coding: Turbo Codes," C. Berrou et al., Proc. 1993 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 1064-1070, May 1993; and "A Soft-Input Soft-Output Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) Module to Decode Parallel and Serial Concatenated Codes," S. Benedetto, TDA Progress Report 42-127, Nov. 12, 1996, each of which is hereby fully incorporated by reference herein as though set forth in full.

Decoders of trellis codes may be configured to determine soft or hard estimates of the underlying source bits or the encoded symbols, or for computing extrinsic outputs for the underlying source bits or encoded symbols, i.e., soft or hard estimates with a priori information about the bits or symbols removed. Various forms of decoders are possible including, for example, maximum a posteriori (MAP) decoders, log-MAP decoders, MAX-Log-MAP decoders, Viterbi decoders, Soft Output Viterbi (SOVA) decoders, A Posteriori Probability (APP) decoders, Soft List Viterbi (Soft-LVA) decoders, etc. For additional information on these decoders, please see "Optimal Decoding of Linear Codes for Minimizing Symbol Error Rate," L. R. Bahl et al., IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, March 1974, pp. 27-30; "Near Shannon Limit Error-Correcting Coding and Decoding: Turbo Codes," C. Berrou et al., Proc. ICC'93 Geneva, Switzerland, May 1993, pp. 1064-1070; "An Intuitive Justification and a Simplified Implementation of the MAP Decoder for Convolutional Codes," A. Viterbi, IEEE Journal On Selected Areas In Telecommunications, Vol. 16, No. 2, February 1998, pp. 260-264; S. Benedetto et al., "A Soft-Input Soft-Output Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) Module to Decode Parallel and Serial Concatenated Codes," TDA Progress Report 42-127, Nov. 15, 1996, pp. 1-20; D. Divsalar et al., "Turbo Trellis Coded Modulation with Iterative Decoding for Mobile Satellite Communications," Proc. Int. Mobile Satellite Conf., June 1997; "A Comparison of Optimal and Sub-Optimal MAP Decoding Algorithms Operating in the Log Domain," Proc. IC''95, Seattle, Wash. 1995, pp. 1009-1013; J. Hagenauer & P. Hoeher, "A Viterbi Algorithm With Soft-Decision Outputs and its applications," Proceedings of IEEE GLOBECOM, Dallas, Tex. sec. 47.1.1-47.1.7 (1989); U.S. Pat. No. 5,181,209; C. Nill & C. E. Sundberg, "List and Soft Symbol Output Viterbi Algorithms: Extensions and Comparisons," IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 43, nos. 2/3/4, pp. 277-87 (February March April 1995); and U.S. Pat. No. 5,537,444, each of which is hereby fully incorporated by reference herein as though set forth in full.

Known decoders of TCM codes are configured to handle QPSK symbols, but are susceptible to performance limitations in applications involving MPSK or QAM symbols beyond QPSK. The problem is particularly acute in applications involving log-MAP decoders, in which probabilities are expressed in the natural log domain. The computations needed to perform log-domain calculations places additional demands on the decoders. <


Free Web Sudoku Puzzles.
Solve with your browser.
        7 4      
    9 6   5      
3 2 4   9       7
8 1           4  
                 
  6           7 9
7       6   8 5 1
      3   7 6    
      9 8        
What is it?



Add Your Site · Terms Of Service · Privacy Policy


DISCLAIMER
Linkgrinder is a free service that searches the Internet and indexes all files found so that you may search quickly and easily for shared files. These files are created and made available individually by users whose identity we are not aware of and who we have no control over. In essence we function like a search engine tool; these files ARE NOT STORED OR SERVED BY OUR NETWORK. We are not responsible for any materials obtained by using our service. We do not monitor any of the contents of these files. These files may contain viruses, illegal materials, materials inappropriate for minors, offensive files and the like. BY USING OUR SERVICE, YOU ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR DOWNLOADING THESE MATERIALS AND WILL INDEMNIFY US FOR ANY DAMAGES THAT MAY BE INCURRED.

For More Specific Information VIEW OUR TERMS OF SERVICE.

Thank you and Enjoy!