Vehicle control system Number:7,367,316 from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) owispatent

Title: Vehicle control system

Abstract: A method for controlling an engine having at least one cylinder, the engine coupled to a vehicle, the engine also having an intake manifold and an outlet control device for controlling flow from the intake manifold into the cylinder, the engine further having an inlet control device for controlling flow into the intake manifold, the outlet control device including an electronic throttle, the engine also having an exhaust gas oxygen sensor, the method comprising of generating a signal representing a request from a driver, determining a desired torque based on said request in response to said signal and to improve drive feel, adjusting the outlet control device based on said desired torque, adjusting throttle position based on an operating parameter and injecting fuel into the engine based on a signal from the sensor to maintain average air/fuel at stoichiometry.

Patent Number: 7,367,316 Issued on 05/06/2008 to Russell,   et al.

---

Inventors:	Russell; John D. (Portland, OR), Kotwicki; Allan J. (Williamsburg, MI), Rutkowski; Brian D. (Ypsilanti, MI)
Assignee:	Ford Global Technologies, LLC (Dearborn, MI)
Appl. No.:	11/867,149
Filed:	October 4, 2007

---

Related U.S. Patent Documents

---

	Application Number	Filing Date	Patent Number	Issue Date
	11548271	Oct., 2006	7299786

---

Current U.S. Class:	123/429 ; 123/434
Current International Class:	F02B 1/00 (20060101); F02B 15/00 (20060101)
Field of Search:	123/429,432,434,435,445,406.23,399,345,347,348,376

---

References Cited [Referenced By]

---

U.S. Patent Documents

3548798	December 1970	Fleischer et al.
4084568	April 1978	Sato et al.
4494506	January 1985	Hayama et al.
4592315	June 1986	Kobayashi et al.
4651684	March 1987	Masuda et al.
4700684	October 1987	Pischinger et al.
4856465	August 1989	Denz et al.
5019989	May 1991	Ueda et al.
5022357	June 1991	Kawamura
5101786	April 1992	Kamio et al.
5115782	May 1992	Klinke et al.
5143037	September 1992	Sawamoto
5152267	October 1992	Komatsu et al.
5168851	December 1992	Itoyama et al.
5170759	December 1992	Ito
5199403	April 1993	Akazaki et al.
5357932	October 1994	Clinton et al.
5365908	November 1994	Takii et al.
5396874	March 1995	Hitomi et al.
5414994	May 1995	Cullen et al.
5517955	May 1996	Yoshioka
5548995	August 1996	Clinton et al.
5606960	March 1997	Takahashi et al.
5628290	May 1997	Iida et al.
5635634	June 1997	Reuschenbach et al.
5654501	August 1997	Grizzle et al.
5666916	September 1997	Fujieda et al.
5676112	October 1997	Bauer et al.
5690071	November 1997	Jankovic
5692471	December 1997	Zhang
5712786	January 1998	Ueda
5724927	March 1998	Suzuki
5740045	April 1998	Livshiz et al.
5746176	May 1998	Damson et al.
5755202	May 1998	Stefanopoulou et al.
5758493	June 1998	Asik
5765527	June 1998	Lehner et al.
5791306	August 1998	Williamson
5803043	September 1998	Bayron et al.
5848529	December 1998	Katoh et al.
5857437	January 1999	Yoskioka
5896840	April 1999	Takahashi
5913298	June 1999	Yoskikawa
5950603	September 1999	Cook et al.
5957096	September 1999	Clarke et al.
5964201	October 1999	Dickers et al.
5967114	October 1999	Yasuoka
6000375	December 1999	Isobe
6006724	December 1999	Takahashi et al.
6006725	December 1999	Stefanopoulou et al.
6009851	January 2000	Iida et al.
6024069	February 2000	Yoshino
6039026	March 2000	Shiraishi et al.
6055476	April 2000	Yoshino
6058906	May 2000	Yoshino
6070567	June 2000	Kakizaki et al.
6095117	August 2000	Minowa et al.
6101993	August 2000	Lewis et al.
6148791	November 2000	Fujieda et al.
6170475	January 2001	Lewis et al.
6178371	January 2001	Light et al.
6182636	February 2001	Russell et al.
6196173	March 2001	Takahashi et al.
6219611	April 2001	Russell
6250283	June 2001	Russell et al.
6269794	August 2001	Schmitz
6560527	May 2003	Russell et al.
6712041	March 2004	Russell et al.
6945225	September 2005	Russell et al.
6962139	November 2005	Russell et al.
6978764	December 2005	Russell et al.
7117847	October 2006	Russell et al.
7290527	November 2007	Russell et al.
7299786	November 2007	Russell et al.
2001/0013329	August 2001	Matsumoto et al.

Foreign Patent Documents

	3705232		Sep., 1988		DE
	3815067		Sep., 1989		DE
	3916605		Nov., 1989		DE
	4209684		Sep., 1993		DE
	4321413		Jan., 1995		DE
	19620883		Nov., 1997		DE
	19847851		Apr., 1999		DE
	19825729		Dec., 1999		DE
	0376703		Jul., 1990		EP
	0440314		Aug., 1991		EP
	0325162		Jul., 1993		EP
	0560476		Sep., 1993		EP
	0640753		Mar., 1995		EP
	0831218		Mar., 1998		EP
	0990775		Apr., 2000		EP
	1020625		Jul., 2000		EP
	1065349		Jan., 2001		EP
	1074716		Feb., 2001		EP
	1136685		Sep., 2001		EP
	2315571		Feb., 1998		GB
	2338085		Dec., 1999		GB
	56018018		Feb., 1981		JP
	57002418		Jan., 1982		JP
	59194058		Nov., 1984		JP
	60240828		Nov., 1985		JP
	62101825		May., 1987		JP
	63032122		Feb., 1988		JP
	63183216		Jul., 1988		JP
	1100316		Apr., 1989		JP
	2176115		Jul., 1990		JP
	3009021		Jan., 1991		JP
	4143410		May., 1992		JP
	4148023		May., 1992		JP
	5086913		Apr., 1993		JP
	9125994		May., 1997		JP
	9256880		Sep., 1997		JP
	9303165		Nov., 1997		JP
	09324672		Dec., 1997		JP
	1037772		Feb., 1998		JP
	10220256		Aug., 1998		JP
	10288055		Oct., 1998		JP
	10288056		Oct., 1998		JP
	11062643		Mar., 1999		JP
	11270368		Oct., 1999		JP
	WO 99/47800		Sep., 1999		WO

Other References

Kluting, Manfred et al. "Throttle-free load control with fully variable valve drives (Drosselfreie Laststeuerung mit vollvariablen Ventiltrieben)." MTZ--Motortechnische Zeitschrift (magazine), Aug. 1999. cited by other.

Primary Examiner: Kwon; John T.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Lippa; Allan Alleman Hall McCoy Russell & Tuttle LLP

---

Parent Case Text

---

This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/548,271 filed Oct. 10, 2006 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,299,786 which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/772,734, filed Feb. 5, 2004, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/022,800, filed Dec. 18, 2001, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. Nos.: Ser. No. 09/420,322, filed Oct. 18, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,560,527; Ser. No. 09/420,323, filed Oct. 18, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,712,041; Ser. No. 09/420,451, filed Oct. 18, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,470,869; Ser. No. 09/420,447, filed Oct. 18, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,978,764; and Ser. No. 09/888,032, filed Jun. 22, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,467,442.

U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/888,032 is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/420,451.

U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/772,734 is also a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. Nos.: Ser. No. 10/370,025, filed Feb. 20, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,945,225; Ser. No. 09/420,323, filed Oct. 18, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,712,041; Ser. No. 10/288,281, filed Nov. 5, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,705,284; Ser. No. 10/765,596, filed Jan. 27, 2004; Ser. No. 10/279,359, filed Oct. 24, 2002; and Ser. No. 09/420,447, filed Oct. 18, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,978,764.

U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/370,025 is a divisional of Ser. No. 09/420,322, filed Oct. 18, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,560,527.

U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/288,281 is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/420,322.

U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/765,596 is a divisional of Ser. No. 10/288,281.

U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/279,359 is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/420,451, filed Oct. 18, 1999. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/420,451 is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/888,032, filed Jun. 22, 2001. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/888,032 is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/420,451, filed Oct. 18, 1999.

Each of the above referenced applications and patents are hereby incorporated herein in its entirety for all purposes.

---

Claims

---

What is claimed is:

1. A method for controlling an engine having at least one cylinder, the engine coupled to a vehicle, the engine also having an intake manifold and an outlet control device for controlling flow from the intake manifold into the cylinder, the engine further having an inlet control device for controlling flow into the intake manifold, the outlet control device including an electronic throttle, the engine also having an exhaust gas oxygen sensor, the method comprising: generating a signal representing a request from a driver; determining a desired torque based on said request; in response to said signal and to improve drive feel, adjusting the outlet control device based on said desired torque; adjusting throttle position based on an operating parameter; and injecting fuel into the engine based on a signal from the sensor to maintain average air/fuel at stoichiometry.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the sensor is located upstream of a three-way catalyst.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the engine is a v-type dual bank engine.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein said injecting fuel further comprises directly injecting fuel into the cylinder during the intake stroke so that a substantially homogeneous air/fuel mixture is formed.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the outlet control device includes variable valve lift.

6. An article of manufacture comprising: a computer storage medium having a computer program encoded therein for controlling an engine having at least one cylinder, the engine coupled to a vehicle, the engine also having an intake manifold and an outlet control device for controlling flow from the intake manifold into the cylinder, the outlet control device including variable valve lift, the engine further having an inlet control device for controlling flow into the intake manifold, the inlet control device including an electronically controlled throttle, said computer storage medium comprising: code for generating a signal representing a request from a driver; code for determining a desired torque based on said request; code for, in response to said signal and to improve drive feel, adjusting the outlet control device based on said desired torque; adjusting throttle position based on an operating parameter; and code for directly injecting fuel into the engine based on a signal from the sensor to maintain average air/fuel at stoichiometry.

---

Description

---

SUMMARY

In accordance with the present invention, a method is provided for controlling an engine having an intake manifold and an outlet control device coupled to the manifold for controlling flow exiting the manifold and entering at least one cylinder of the engine. The engine further includes an inlet control device for controlling flow entering the manifold. The method includes providing an engine command; calculating a desired cylinder charge based on said command; and adjusting the outlet control device to provide said desired cylinder charge.

The engine command may be, for example, a driver command, such as a driver torque command. Further, the outlet control device may be implemented in with a variety of mechanisms. For example, in one embodiment the outlet control device is a valve of the engine having a variable lift. In one embodiment the outlet device is a valve having variable timing. Likewise, the inlet device may be adjusted in response to a variety of parameters. For example, in one embodiment the inlet device is adjusted based on manifold pressure. Still further, engine control may also include adjusting of the inlet control device.

The details of one or more embodiments of the invention are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.

DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

The object and advantages of the invention claimed herein will be more readily understood by reading an example of an embodiment in which the invention is used to advantage with reference to the following drawings wherein:

FIGS. 1A and 1B are a block diagrams of an embodiment in which the invention is used to advantage;

FIG. 2A is a block diagram of an embodiment in which the invention is used to advantage;

FIGS. 2B-20 are graphs describing operation of the embodiment in FIG. 2A;

FIGS. 3-5, and 8-10 are high level flowcharts which perform a portion of operation of the embodiment shown in FIGS. 1A, 1B, and 2A;

FIG. 6 is a graph showing how various factors are related to engine operation according to the present invention;

FIG. 7 is a graph depicting results using the present invention;

FIGS. 11A-11F are graphs describing operation of an embodiment of the present invention; and

FIGS. 12, 13 and 14 are a block diagrams of an embodiment in which the invention is used to advantage.

Like reference symbols in the various drawings indicate like elements.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Description of Preferred Embodiments

Direct injection spark ignited internal combustion engine 10, comprising a plurality of combustion chambers, is controlled by electronic engine controller 12. Combustion chamber 30 of engine 10 is shown in FIG. 1A including combustion chamber walls 32 with piston 36 positioned therein and connected to crankshaft 40. In this particular example piston 30 includes a recess or bowl (not shown) to help in forming stratified charges of air and fuel. Combustion chamber, or cylinder, 30 is shown communicating with intake manifold 44 and exhaust manifold 48 via respective intake valves 52a and 52b (not shown), and exhaust valves 54a and 54b (not shown). Fuel injector 66A is shown directly coupled to combustion chamber 30 for delivering liquid fuel directly therein in proportion to the pulse width of signal fpw received from controller 12 via conventional electronic driver 68. Fuel is delivered to fuel injector 66A by a conventional high pressure fuel system (not shown) including a fuel tank, fuel pumps, and a fuel rail.

Intake manifold 44 is shown communicating with throttle body 58 via throttle plate 62. In this particular example, throttle plate 62 is coupled to electric motor 94 so that the position of throttle plate 62 is controlled by controller 12 via electric motor 94. This configuration is commonly referred to as electronic throttle control (ETC) which is also utilized during idle speed control. In an alternative embodiment (not shown), which is well known to those skilled in the art, a bypass air passageway is arranged in parallel with throttle plate 62 to control inducted airflow during idle speed control via a throttle control valve positioned within the air passageway.

Exhaust gas oxygen sensor 76 is shown coupled to exhaust manifold 48 upstream of catalytic converter 70. In this particular example, sensor 76 provides signal EGO to controller 12 which converts signal EGO into two-state signal EGOS. A high voltage state of signal EGOS indicates exhaust gases are rich of stoichiometry and a low voltage state of signal EGOS indicates exhaust gases are lean of stoichiometry. Signal EGOS is used to advantage during feedback air/fuel control in a conventional manner to maintain average air/fuel at stoichiometry during the stoichiometric homogeneous mode of operation.

Conventional distributorless ignition system 88 provides ignition spark to combustion chamber 30 via spark plug 92 in response to spark advance signal SA from controller 12. Controller 12 causes combustion chamber 30 to operate in either a homogeneous air/fuel mode or a stratified air/fuel mode by controlling injection timing. In the stratified mode, controller 12 activates fuel injector 66A during the engine compression stroke so that fuel is sprayed directly into the bowl of piston 36. Stratified air/fuel layers are thereby formed. The strata closest to the spark plug contains a stoichiometric mixture or a mixture slightly rich of stoichiometry, and subsequent strata contain progressively leaner mixtures. During the homogeneous mode, controller 12 activates fuel injector 66A during the intake stroke so that a substantially homogeneous air/fuel mixture is formed when ignition power is supplied to spark plug 92 by ignition system 88. Controller 12 controls the amount of fuel delivered by fuel injector 66A so that the homogeneous air/fuel mixture in chamber 30 can be selected to be at stoichiometry, a value rich of stoichiometry, or a value lean of stoichiometry. The stratified air/fuel mixture will always be at a value lean of stoichiometry, the exact air/fuel being a function of the amount of fuel delivered to combustion chamber 30. An additional split mode of operation wherein additional fuel is injected during the exhaust stroke while operating in the stratified mode, is also possible.

Nitrogen oxide (NOx) absorbent or trap 72 is shown positioned downstream of catalytic converter 70. NOx trap 72 absorbs NOx when engine 10 is operating lean of stoichiometry. The absorbed NOx is subsequently reacted with HC and catalyzed during a NOx purge cycle when controller 12 causes engine 10 to operate in either a rich homogeneous mode or a stoichiometric homogeneous mode.

Controller 12 is shown in FIG. 1A as a conventional microcomputer including a microprocessor unit 102, input/output ports 104, an electronic storage medium for executable programs and calibration values shown as read only memory chip 106 in this particular example, random access memory 108, keep alive memory 110, and a conventional data bus. Controller 12 is shown receiving various signals from sensors coupled to engine 10, in addition to those signals previously discussed, including a measurement of inducted mass air flow (MAF) from mass air flow sensor 100 coupled to throttle body 58; engine coolant temperature (ECT) from temperature sensor LI 2 coupled to cooling sleeve 114; a profile ignition pickup signal (PIP) from Hall effect sensor 118 coupled to crankshaft 40; and throttle position TP from throttle position sensor 120; and absolute Manifold Pressure Signal MAP from sensor 122. Engine speed signal RPM is generated by controller 12 from signal PIP in a conventional manner and manifold pressure signal MAP provides an indication of engine load. In a preferred aspect of the present invention, sensor 118, which is also used as an engine speed sensor, produces a predetermined number of equally spaced pulses every revolution of the crankshaft.

In this particular example, temperature Tcat of catalytic converter 70 and temperature Ttrp of NOx trap 72 are inferred from engine operation as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,414,994, the specification of which is incorporated herein by reference. In an alternate embodiment, temperature Tcat is provided by temperature sensor 124 and temperature Ttrp is provided by temperature sensor 126.

Continuing with FIG. 1A, camshaft 130 of engine 10 is shown communicating with rocker arms 132 and 134 for actuating intake valves 52a, 52b and exhaust valve 54a. 54b. Camshaft 130 is directly coupled to housing 136. Housing 136 forms a toothed wheel having a plurality of teeth 138. Housing 136 is hydraulically coupled to an inner shaft (not shown), which is in turn directly linked to camshaft 130 via a timing chain (not shown). Therefore, housing 136 and camshaft 130 rotate at a speed substantially equivalent to the inner camshaft. The inner camshaft rotates at a constant speed ratio to crankshaft 40. However, by manipulation of the hydraulic coupling as will be described later herein, the relative position of camshaft 130 to crankshaft 40 can be varied by hydraulic pressures in advance chamber 142 and retard chamber 144. By allowing high pressure hydraulic fluid to enter advance chamber 142, the relative relationship between camshaft 130 and crankshaft 40 is advanced. Thus, intake valves 52a, 52b and exhaust valves 54a, 54b open and close at a time earlier than normal relative to crankshaft 40. Similarly, by allowing high pressure hydraulic fluid to enter retard chamber 144, the relative relationship between camshaft 130 and crankshaft 40 is retarded. Thus, intake valves 52a, 52b and exhaust valves 54a, 54b open and close at a time later than normal relative to crankshaft 40.

Teeth 138, being coupled to housing 136 and camshaft 130, allow for measurement of relative cam position via cam timing sensor 150 providing signal VCT to controller 12. Teeth 1, 2, 3, and 4 are preferably used for measurement of cam timing and are equally spaced (for example, in a V-8 dual bank engine, spaced 90 degrees apart from one another), while tooth 5 is preferably used for cylinder identification, as described later herein. In addition, Controller 12 sends control signals (LACT,RACT) to conventional solenoid valves (not shown) to control the flow of hydraulic fluid either into advance chamber 142, retard chamber 144, or neither.

Relative cam timing is measured using the method described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,548,995, which is incorporated herein by reference. In general terms, the time, or rotation angle between the rising edge of the PIP signal and receiving a signal from one of the plurality of teeth 138 on housing 136 gives a measure of the relative cam timing. For the particular example of a V-8 engine, with two cylinder banks and a five toothed wheel, a measure of cam timing for a particular bank is received four times per revolution, with the extra signal used for cylinder identification.

Referring now to FIG. 1B, a port fuel injection configuration is shown where fuel injector 66B is coupled to intake manifold 44, rather than directly cylinder 30.

Referring now to FIG. 2A, a more general diagram shows manifold 44a, with inlet flow, m_in, and outlet flow, m_out. Inlet flow, m_in, is governed by inlet control device 170. Outlet flow, m_out, is governed by outlet flow device 171. In a preferred embodiment, manifold 44a is an intake manifold of an engine, inlet control device 170 is a throttle, and outlet control device 171 is a variable cam timing mechanism. However, as one skilled in the art would recognize, there are many alternative embodiments of the present invention. For example, outlet control device could be a swirl control valve, a variable valve timing mechanism, a variable valve lift mechanism, or an electronically controlled intake valve used in camless engine technology.

Continuing with FIG. 2A, there are other variables that effect flow entering and exiting manifold 44a. For example, pressures p1 and p2, along with inlet control device 170, determine flow m_in. Similarly, pressures p2 and p3, along with outlet device 171 determine flow m_out. Therefore, flow storage in manifold 44a, which dictates how fast pressure p2 can change, affects flow m_out. In an example where manifold 44a is an intake manifold of an engine operating at stoichiometry, flow m_out represents flow entering a cylinder and is directly proportional to engine torque.

FIGS. 2B-2K illustrates the effect of such interrelationships on system performance. In FIG. 2B, inlet control device 170 is rapidly changed at time t1. The resulting change in outlet flow (m.sub.out) is shown in FIG. 2C. The resulting change in inlet flow (m_in) is shown in FIG. 2D. This example has outlet control device 171 fixed, and therefore represents conventional engine operation and prior art operation where throttle position is used to control outlet flow (m_out). In this example, a rapid change in inlet control device 170 does not produce an equally rapid change in exit flow m_out.

According to the present invention, in FIG. 2E, outlet control device 171 is rapidly changed at time t2. The resulting change in outlet flow (m_out) is shown in FIG. 2F. The resulting change in inlet flow (m_in) is shown in FIG. 2G. This example has inlet control device 170 fixed, and therefore represents adjustment of outlet device 170 only to control outlet flow (m_out). In this example, a rapid change in outlet control device 170 does produce an equally rapid change in exit flow m_out. However, the rapid change is not completely sustained.

According to the present invention, in FIG. 2H, inlet control device 170 is rapidly changed at time t3. Similarly, in FIG. 21, outlet control device 171 is rapidly changed at time t3. The resulting change in outlet flow (m_out) is shown in FIG. 2J. The resulting change in inlet flow (m_in) is shown in FIG. 2K. This example varies both inlet control device 170 and outlet control device 170 concurrently. In this example, a rapid change in both inlet control device and 170 outlet control device 171 does produce an equally rapid change in exit flow m-out, where the rapid change is sustained.

According to the present invention, in FIG. 2L, inlet control device 170 is rapidly changed at time t4. Similarly, in FIG. 2M, outlet control device 171 is rapidly changed at time t4 to a greater extent than in FIG. 2I. The resulting change in outlet flow (m_out) is shown in FIG. 2N. The resulting change in inlet flow (m_in) is shown in FIG. 20. This example varies both inlet control device 170 and outlet control device 170 concurrently. In this example, a rapid change in both inlet control device and 170 outlet control device 171 does produce an equally rapid change in exit flow m_out, where the rapid change is sustained and actually produces a certain amount of peak, or overshoot. This represents how the present invention can be used to not only rapidly produce an increase in outlet flow, but to also add an overshoot. Thus, a control system according to the present invention can therefore generate an airflow lead control. Such lead control is advantageous for engine idle speed control to counteract engine inertia, or for vehicle launch conditions, to give improved drive feel.

According to the present invention, by using an outlet control device it is possible to rapidly control flow exiting a manifold. Further, by controlling both an inlet and outlet control device it is possible to more accurately rapidly control flow exiting a manifold in various shapes.

In cases where engine 10 operates at a stoichiometric air/fuel ratio, then engine torque directly proportional to cylinder charge, which is in turn proportional to exit flow m_out and engine speed. Thus, according to the present invention, by controlling engine airflow to a desired value.

Engine Idle Speed Control

Referring now to FIG. 3, a routine is described for controlling engine speed using both throttle position and cam timing. In step 310, an engine speed error (Nerr) is calculated based on a difference between the desired engine speed (Ndes) and an actual engine speed (Nact). Then, in step 320, the desired change in cylinder charge is calculated from speed error using controller K1, where controller K1 is represented in the Laplace domain as K1(s) as is known to those skilled in the art. The desired in cylinder charge (.DELTA.mcyl) is preferably calculated using a proportional controller. Therefore, in the preferred embodiment, controller K1 represents a proportional controller. However, as those skilled in the art will recognize, various other control schemes can be used in place of proportional controller K1 For example, proportional integral derivative controllers, or sliding mode controllers, or any other controllers known to those skilled in the art, can be used. Next, in step 330, an intermediate throttle position (Tpint) is calculated from speed error and controller K3. As described above, various controllers can be used for controller K3. In a preferred embodiment, controller K3 is an integral controller. Next, in step 340, a nominal cam timing error (VCTerr) is calculated based on a difference between a desired nominal cam timing (VCTdesnom) and actual cam timing (VCTact). Desired nominal cam timing (VCTdesnom) can be determined based on operating conditions, for example, based on idle mode, or drive mode. Also, desired nominal cam timing (VCTdesnom) can be set as a function of desired engine torque, or any other steady state scheduling method known to those skilled in the art. Next, in step 350, an intermediate timing (VCTint) is calculated from nominal cam timing error and controller K2. Controller K2 can be any controller known to those skilled in the art. In the preferred embodiment, controller K2 is a proportional integral controller.

Referring now to FIG. 4, a routine is described for calculating adjustments to cam timing and throttle position to rapidly change cylinder charge. First, in step 410, manifold pressure (Pm) is estimated or measured using sensor 122. In the preferred embodiment, manifold pressure (Pm) is estimated using methods known to those skilled in the art. For example, manifold pressure can be estimated using signal MAF from mass airflow sensor 100, engine speed, and other signals known to those skilled in the art to effect manifold pressure. Next, in step 412, the desired change in cylinder charge (.DELTA.ncyl) is read from FIG. 3. Next, in step 414, a change in cam timing (.DELTA.VCT) is determined to give the desired change in cylinder charge at manifold pressure (Pm) read in step 410. Step 414 is performed using maps relating to cam timing, cylinder charge, and manifold pressure. The maps can be determined theoretically using engine models or measured using engine test data. Next, in step 416, a change in throttle position (.DELTA.TP) is determined to give the desired change in cylinder charge (.DELTA.ncyl) at manifold pressure (Pm) determined in step 410. Step 416 is similarly performed using characteristic maps relating parameters, throttle position, cylinder charge, and manifold pressure. The maps can be determined either using engine models or engine test data.

Regarding FIG. 5, the routine is described for calculating the desired cam timing and desired throttle position. First, in step 510, a desired cylinder, desired cam timing (VCTdes) is determined based on the desired change in cam timing and intermediate cam timing. Next, in step 512, the desired throttle position (TPdes) is determined based on intermediate throttle position and desired change in throttle position. However, when a cam timing position is desired that is greater than a maximum possible cam timing, or when a minimum cam timing is less than a minimum possible cam timing, desired cam timing (VCTdes) is clipped to the maximum or minimum value. In other words adjustment of cam timing may not be able to provide the desired increase, or decrease in cylinder air charge. In this case, cam timing is clipped to the achievable limit value and throttle position is relied upon to provide control.

Steady State Constraints

As described above herein with particular reference to FIGS. 3-5, a control method for controlling engine airflow, or engine torque, and thereby engine speed was described. In addition, the method included a method for rapidly controlling cylinder charge using both an inlet and outlet control device, while also relatively slowly controlling the outlet control device to a nominal position. Both of these process arc now further illustrated using both FIGS. 6 and 7.

Referring now to FIG. 6, a graph is shown with throttle position (TP) on the vertical axis and cam timing (VCT) on the horizontal axis. Dash dotted lines are shown for constant values of engine torque (Te), assuming stoichiometric conditions, while solid lines show constant value of manifold pressure. According to the present invention, the engine can quickly change operating points along the lines of constant pressure (thereby rapidly changing engine airflow and torque) since there are no manifold dynamics in this direction. However, the engine can change only relatively slowly along the dash dotted lines if air/fuel ratio is fixed (for example at stoichiometry). The dashed vertical line represents the nominal desired cam timing for the given operating conditions. For example, the nominal timing for idle conditions, or the nominal timing for the current desired engine torque.

In other words, manifold dynamics represent dynamics associated with changing manifold pressure and explain why flow entering the cylinder is not always equal to flow entering the manifold. Manifold pressure cannot instantly change due to manifold volume. As manifold volume increases, manifold dynamics become slower. Conversely, as manifold volume decreases, manifold dynamics become faster. Thus, manifold dynamics, or manifold delay, is a function of manifold volume. As described above, when moving along lines of constant pressure, manifold dynamics are essentially immaterial. Therefore, flow changes are not limited by manifold dynamics when inlet and outlet control devices are changed to affect flow in similar directions. By changing inlet and outlet control devices faster than manifold dynamics to increase along both the abscissa and ordinate of FIG. 6, cylinder flow changes faster than manifold dynamics. Stated another way, cylinder flow changes faster than it would if only the inlet control device changed infinitely fast. When inlet and outlet control devices are changed to affect flow in opposite directions, cylinder charge can be kept constant. In particular, both the inlet and outlet control devices are changed slower than manifold dynamics since manifold pressure is changed. This is particular useful when engine airflow, or engine torque, is to be kept relatively constant yet it is desired to place either the inlet control device or the outlet control device in a specified location.

Referring now to both FIGS. 6 and 7, an example of operation according to an aspect of the present invention is now described. First, the system is operating at point 1. For example, the desired engine torque (Ted) is Te2, or this happens to be the engine torque to maintain a desired engine speed. Then, either the desired engine torque (Ted) changes to Te3, or a torque disturbance causes an engine speed to drop, thereby requiring an increase in engine torque to Te3 to maintain the desired engine speed. At this point (time t5), controller 12 causes both the throttle position and cam timing to change so that the engine system quickly moves to point 2. Next, in order to maintain cam timing and the nominal cam timing, controller 12 causes both the throttle position and cam timing to move to point 3 at a rate to slower than the manifold dynamics.

Thus, according to the present invention, throttle position and cam timing are caused to move in the following way. When it is desired to rapidly increase cylinder air charge irrespective of manifold volume: 1) throttle position moves in a way that causes an increase in throttle opening area, and 2) cam timing is adjusted in a way to increase the inducted cylinder air charge for a given manifold pressure moved. Similarly, when it is desired to rapidly decrease cylinder air charge irrespective of manifold volume: 1) throttle position moves in a way that causes a decrease in throttle opening area, and 2) cam timing is adjusted in a way to decrease the inducted cylinder air charge for a given manifold pressure. Thus, it is possible to rapidly change and maintain flow into the cylinder by this combined action.

However, when it is desired to maintain cylinder air charge and either increase throttle opening or cause cam timing to move so that less air charge is inducted for a given manifold pressure, or both, 1) throttle position moves in a way that causes an increase in throttle opening area, and 2) cam timing is adjusted in a way to decrease the inducted cylinder air charge for a given manifold pressure. Thus, cylinder charge can be kept constant by this opposing action. Alternatively, when it is desired to maintain cylinder air charge and either decrease throttle opening or cause cam timing to move so that more air charge is inducted for a given manifold pressure, or both, 1) throttle position moves in a way that causes a decrease in throttle opening area, and 2) cam timing is adjusted in a way to increase the inducted cylinder air charge for a given manifold pressure. Again, cylinder charge can be kept constant by this opposing action. Such coordinated control is advantageous in that steady state optimization constraints on cam timing can be provided while still providing the ability to control cylinder air charge rapidly.

Engine Torque Control

Referring now to FIG. 8, a routine is described for controlling engine torque rather than engine speed as described in FIG. 3. Engine torque control according to the present invention may be used for various reasons, including normal driving operating, traction control, and/or cruise control. In other words, FIG. 8, along with FIGS. 3-5 can be used to control engine torque, where steps 310-330 are replaced by FIG. 8. Regarding FIG. 8, first, in step 810, a desired engine torque (Ted) is determined. Those skilled in the art will recognize that desired engine torque (Ted) can be determined in various ways. For example, desired engine torque (Ted) can be determine from desired wheel torque and gear ratio, from pedal position and vehicle speed, from pedal position and engine speed, or any other method known to those skilled in the art. Then, in step 820, desired cylinder charge (mcyld) is determined based on a function (h) of desired engine torque (Ted). Function (h) is based on a desired air/fuel ratio, such as stoichiometric conditions.

Continuing with FIG. 8, in step 830, desired change in cylinder charge (Dmcyl) is determined based on the difference between desired cylinder charge (mcyld) and actual cylinder charge (mcyl). Then, in step 840, intermediate throttle position (Tpint) is calculated from desired change in cylinder charge (Dmcyl) and controller K3. As described above, various controllers can be used for controller K3. In a preferred embodiment, controller K3 is an integral controller. Then, in step 850, a nominal cam timing (VCTdesnom) is determined based on function (g) and desired engine torque (Ted). Then, the routine continues to step 340 in FIG. 3.

Alternative Embodiment for Cylinder Charge, Torque, and Engine Speed Control

An alternative embodiment is now described that can be used to control either cylinder air charge, Engine Torque at a given air/fuel ratio, or engine speed. Referring now to FIG. 9, in step 910, a determination is made as to whether the engine is currently in an idle condition. Those skilled in the art will recognize various methods for determining idle conditions such as accelerator pedal position, engine speed, and various other factors. When the answer to step 910 is YES, the routine continues to step 912. In step 912, the desired cylinder charge (mcyldes) is based on an engine speed error (Nerr). The desired cylinder charge is calculated using function L1, which can represent any function such as, for example, engine speed error multiplied by a constant gain, which is the preferred embodiment. Otherwise, when the answer to step 910 is NO, the routine continues to step 914. In step 914, the desired cylinder charge is calculated based on either a driver command or operating conditions using function (L2). Those skilled in the art will recognize various methods for calculating a desired cylinder charge from a driver command such as, for example, to provide a desired engine torque, a desired wheel torque, an engine output, or provide any other condition requested by the driver. Those skilled in the art will also recognize various operating conditions that can affect a desired cylinder charge such as, for example, engine starting conditions, cold conditions, or cranking conditions.

Continuing with FIG. 9, the routine continues from either step 912 or step 914 to step 916. In step 916, a cylinder charge error (mcylerr) is calculated based on desired cylinder charge and actual cylinder charge (mcylact). Next, in step 918, cam timing nominal error is calculated. Next, in step 920, intermediate cam timing is calculated from cam timing nominal error and controller H1. In a preferred embodiment, controller H1 is an integral controller known to those skilled in the art. Also, in a preferred embodiment, the gains of controller H1 are determined so that the cam timing is adjusted slower than manifold dynamics. In other words, the gains of controller H1 are determined based on manifold volume, and engine speed. However, controller Hi can be any controller known to those skilled in the art such as, for example, a PID controller, a PI controller, or a P controller. Next, in step 930, intermediate throttle position is calculated from cylinder charge error and controller H2. In a preferred embodiment, controller H2 is an integral controller; however, as those skilled in the art will recognize, various controllers can be used. Next, in step 940, a difference in cam timing is calculated from cylinder charge